The effects of complexity on confidence ratings in linguistic integration
C T James1, M L Hillinger, B J Murphy
1Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Busch Campus, 08903, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Abstract:
Bransford and Franks (1971) introduced a paradigm for the study of linguistic integration. Their primary measure was subjects' rated confidence in their responses. The present paper considers the appropriateness of this dependent variable, and concludes that the relation between sentence complexity and rated confidence is too small and unstable to justify the emphasis which confidence ratings have received. Further, certain differences between concrete and abstract sentences were obscured by a confidence analysis. The proportion of old responses is championed as a more appropriate dependent variable. Finally, it is shown that increasing the amount of specific memory necessarily decreases the size of the complexity effect.
Related Concept Videos
Confidence Coefficient
Language and Cognition
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Social Facilitation
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect


