Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Learning Disabilities01:25

Learning Disabilities

711
Learning disabilities are cognitive disorders caused by neurological impairments that affect cognitive functions like language and reading, without indicating overall intellectual or developmental challenges. These disabilities differ from global intellectual or developmental disabilities as they are limited to distinct cognitive functions. Common learning disabilities include dysgraphia, dyslexia, and dyscalculia, each of which impacts unique aspects of learning.
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...
711
Encoding01:19

Encoding

1.1K
Information enters the brain through encoding, which is the input of information into the memory system. Once sensory information is received from the environment, the brain labels or codes it. The information is then organized with similar information and connected to existing concepts. Encoding occurs through automatic processing and effortful processing.
Automatic processing involves the encoding of details like time, space, frequency, and the meaning of words, usually done without conscious...
1.1K
Language Development01:22

Language Development

1.1K
Children master language quickly and with relative ease, supported by both biological predisposition and reinforcement. B. F. Skinner (1957) proposed that language is learned through reinforcement, while Noam Chomsky (1965) argued that language acquisition mechanisms are biologically determined.
The critical period for language acquisition suggests that the ability to acquire language is at its peak early in life. As people age, this proficiency decreases. Language development begins very...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whole Language vs. Code Emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction.

Annals of dyslexia·2013
Same author

Patient satisfaction with nurse-led follow-up for breast cancer: a questionnaire study.

The breast journal·2011
Same author

Differential interactions between IGFBP-3 and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) in normal vs cancerous breast epithelial cells.

British journal of cancer·2002
Same author

Grammatism.

Brain and language·2001
Same author

Rapid determination of protein folds using residual dipolar couplings.

Journal of molecular biology·2000
Same author

Direct measurement of 1H-1H dipolar couplings in proteins: a complement to traditional NOE measurements.

Journal of biomolecular NMR·2000
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K

Phonetic recoding and reading difficulty in beginning readers.

L S Mark1, D Shankweiler, I Y Liberman

  • 1University of Connecticut, 06268, Storrs, Connecticut.

Memory & Cognition
|November 9, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Good readers are more sensitive to phonetic similarities than poor readers, impacting their recall. This suggests differences in how reading abilities affect phonetic representation access.

More Related Videos

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

7.7K
Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

1.3K
Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
14:43

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish

Published on: July 18, 2020

7.7K
Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age
15:00

Assessing Dyslexia at Six Year of Age

Published on: May 1, 2020

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Educational Psychology

Background:

  • Previous research indicates good readers are more affected by phonetic characteristics than poor readers in recall tasks.
  • Good readers exhibit more errors with rhyming letter names, unlike poor readers who show similar error rates for rhyming and non-rhyming sequences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if differing rehearsal strategies explain the interaction between reading ability and phonetic similarity.
  • To determine if phonetic representation access differs between good and poor readers.

Main Methods:

  • A recognition memory paradigm was employed to minimize rehearsal opportunities.
  • Both good and poor readers were tested using rhyming and non-rhyming words.

Main Results:

  • Good readers' performance was significantly more influenced by phonetic similarity compared to poor readers.
  • Findings align with prior studies on reading ability and phonetic processing.

Conclusions:

  • The study supports the hypothesis that good and poor readers possess distinct abilities in accessing phonetic representations.
  • Phonetic similarity impacts memory recall differently based on reading proficiency.