Dissociation of frontal N100 from occipital P100 in pattern reversal visual evoked potentials

We studied the relationship between occipital P100 and frontal N100 in visual evoked potentials produced by pattern reversal in normal subjects and two groups of patients. Recording derivation was critical for interpretation since both Fz and Oz electrode sites are active. In 9 patients, but no normal subjects, P100 was absent. In these patients, use of a standard Oz-Fz montage resulted in the erroneous impression of a 'normal' P100 since a downward deflection was produced by the inverting effect of the amplifier on an intact N100 at Fz. When both P100 and N100 were present (at Oz and Fz respectively), their latencies were usually similar but not identical which contributed to apparent latency shifts or W-shaped wave forms in the Oz-Fz derivation. We conclude that use of a non-cephalic or relatively inactive scalp position (such as the mastoid) should be used as a reference site in addition to Fz to reduce interpretive errors.