Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.2K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.2K
Equilibrium Conditions for a Particle01:23

Equilibrium Conditions for a Particle

2.5K
When an object is in equilibrium, it is either at rest or moving with a constant velocity. There are two types of equilibrium: static and dynamic. Static equilibrium occurs when an object is at rest, while dynamic equilibrium occurs when an object is moving with a constant velocity. In both cases, there must be a balance of forces acting on the object.
To understand the concept of equilibrium, let us first consider the forces acting on an object. When different forces act on an object, they can...
2.5K
The Pauli Exclusion Principle03:06

The Pauli Exclusion Principle

51.7K
The arrangement of electrons in the orbitals of an atom is called its electron configuration. We describe an electron configuration with a symbol that contains three pieces of information:
51.7K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution01:14

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution

1.7K
Near absolute zero temperatures, in the presence of a magnetic field, the majority of nuclei prefer the lower energy spin-up state to the higher energy spin-down state. As temperatures increase, the energy from thermal collisions distributes the spins more equally between the two states. The Boltzmann distribution equation gives the ratio of the number of spins predicted in the spin −½ (N−) and spin +½ (N+) states.
1.7K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.5K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.5K
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin01:08

Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin

5.1K
All atomic particles possess an intrinsic angular momentum, or 'spin'. Electrons, protons, and neutrons each have a spin value of ½, although protons and neutrons in nuclei may have higher half-integer spins owing to energetic factors.
Atomic nuclei have a net nuclear spin, , which can have an integer or half-integer value. In atomic nuclei, the spins of protons are paired against each other but not with neutrons, and vice versa. Consequently, an even number of protons does not contribute...
5.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Electrolyte Engineering Enables Selective Electrocatalytic Hydrogenation of Furfural to 2-Methylfuran.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Fractional charge density functional theory elucidates electro-inductive and electric field effects at electrochemical interfaces.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Velocity gauge for oscillator strength in ΔSCF theory.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Eliminating delocalization error through localized orbital scaling correction with orbital relaxation from linear response.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Ultrasensitive Wash-Free Homogeneous CRISPR Assay Using Spatial Proximity Chemiluminescence Reporter.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

A Target-And-Activate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Strategy for Precision Imaging of Intratumoral Bacteria and Screening Antibiotics to Suppress Breast Cancer Metastasis.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders
10:10

Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders

Published on: December 4, 2020

1.1K

Benchmark tests and spin adaptation for the particle-particle random phase approximation.

Yang Yang1, Helen van Aggelen, Stephan N Steinmann

  • 1Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|November 12, 2013
PubMed
Summary

The particle-particle random phase approximation (pp-RPA) offers accurate correlation energy calculations in density functional theory. A new algorithm significantly reduces computational cost, showing reliable energy predictions for chemical applications.

More Related Videos

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

9.3K
Visually Based Characterization of the Incipient Particle Motion in Regular Substrates: From Laminar to Turbulent Conditions
11:51

Visually Based Characterization of the Incipient Particle Motion in Regular Substrates: From Laminar to Turbulent Conditions

Published on: February 22, 2018

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders
10:10

Three-Dimensional Particle Shape Analysis Using X-ray Computed Tomography: Experimental Procedure and Analysis Algorithms for Metal Powders

Published on: December 4, 2020

1.1K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

9.3K
Visually Based Characterization of the Incipient Particle Motion in Regular Substrates: From Laminar to Turbulent Conditions
11:51

Visually Based Characterization of the Incipient Particle Motion in Regular Substrates: From Laminar to Turbulent Conditions

Published on: February 22, 2018

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Quantum Chemistry
  • Density Functional Theory

Background:

  • The particle-particle random phase approximation (pp-RPA) approximates correlation energy in DFT via adiabatic connection.
  • pp-RPA exhibits minimal delocalization and static correlation errors for single bonds.
  • Its high computational cost (O(N^6)) limits practical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Implement a computationally efficient spin-separated and spin-adapted pp-RPA algorithm.
  • Reduce the computational scaling of the pp-RPA method.
  • Validate the accuracy and reliability of the improved pp-RPA for chemical applications.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a spin-separated and spin-adapted pp-RPA algorithm.
  • Performed benchmark tests on standard databases: G2/97 enthalpies of formation and DBH24 reaction barriers.
  • Evaluated performance on non-bonded interaction test sets (HB6/04, CT7/04, DI6/04, WI9/04).

Main Results:

  • The pp-RPA achieved a significantly lower mean absolute error (8.3 kcal/mol) on G2/97 compared to ph-RPA (22.7 kcal/mol).
  • pp-RPA's error remained consistent across molecular sizes, unlike ph-RPA.
  • Both pp-RPA and ph-RPA accurately predicted reaction energies, barriers, and non-bonded interactions for organic molecules.

Conclusions:

  • The developed pp-RPA algorithm offers a substantial reduction in computational cost.
  • pp-RPA provides reliable energy calculations for chemical applications, with minimal error increase for larger systems.
  • The adiabatic connection formalism shows promise for developing broadly applicable and accurate density functionals.