Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Left ventricular hypertrophy patterns and incidence of heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction
Raghava S Velagaleti1, Philimon Gona2, Michael J Pencina3
1Framingham Heart Study, Framingham, Massachusetts; Division of Cardiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Insights
Different left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy patterns increase heart failure (HF) risk. Eccentric hypertrophy is linked to HF with reduced ejection fraction, while concentric hypertrophy is associated with HF with preserved ejection fraction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Left ventricular (LV) mass, wall thickness, and internal dimension are established risk factors for heart failure (HF).
- The specific impact of distinct LV hypertrophy patterns on the incidence and types of HF remains incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between different patterns of LV hypertrophy and the incidence of new-onset HF.
- To determine if specific LV hypertrophy patterns are differentially related to HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) versus HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Main Methods:
- Classified 4,768 Framingham Heart Study participants into four LV hypertrophy groups: normal, concentric remodeling, concentric hypertrophy, and eccentric hypertrophy.
- Utilized American Society of Echocardiography criteria for LV mass indexed to body surface area and relative wall thickness.
- Followed participants for a mean of 21 years to ascertain HF incidence and type.
Main Results:
- LV hypertrophy patterns were significantly associated with increased HF incidence compared to normal LV morphology (p = 0.0002).
- Eccentric hypertrophy demonstrated the highest HF risk (HR 1.89), followed by concentric hypertrophy (HR 1.40).
- Eccentric hypertrophy was linked to a higher risk of HFrEF (HR 2.23), whereas concentric hypertrophy was associated with an increased risk of HFpEF (HR 1.66).
Conclusions:
- In a large community-based cohort, distinct LV hypertrophy patterns differentially influence HF risk and type.
- Eccentric hypertrophy is a significant predictor of HFrEF.
- Concentric hypertrophy is a notable risk factor for HFpEF.
Abstract:
Higher left ventricular (LV) mass, wall thickness, and internal dimension are associated with increased heart failure (HF) risk. Whether different LV hypertrophy patterns vary with respect to rates and types of HF incidence is unclear. In this study, 4,768 Framingham Heart Study participants (mean age 50 years, 56% women) were classified into 4 mutually exclusive LV hypertrophy pattern groups (normal, concentric remodeling, concentric hypertrophy, and eccentric hypertrophy) using American Society of Echocardiography-recommended thresholds of echocardiographic LV mass indexed to body surface area and relative wall thickness, and these groups were related to HF incidence. Whether risk for HF types (HF with reduced ejection fraction [<45%] vs preserved ejection fraction [≥45%]) varied by hypertrophy pattern was then evaluated. On follow-up (mean 21 years), 458 participants (9.6%, 250 women) developed new-onset HF. The age- and gender-adjusted 20-year HF incidence increased from 6.96% in the normal left ventricle group to 8.67%, 13.38%, and 15.27% in the concentric remodeling, concentric hypertrophy, and eccentric hypertrophy groups, respectively. After adjustment for co-morbidities and incident myocardial infarction, LV hypertrophy patterns were associated with higher HF incidence relative to the normal left ventricle group (p = 0.0002); eccentric hypertrophy carried the greatest risk (hazard ratio [HR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41 to 2.54), followed by concentric hypertrophy (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.87). Participants with eccentric hypertrophy had a higher propensity for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.48 to 3.37), whereas those with concentric hypertrophy were more prone to HF with preserved ejection fraction (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.51). In conclusion, in this large community-based sample, HF risk varied by LV hypertrophy pattern, with eccentric and concentric hypertrophy predisposing to HF with reduced and preserved ejection fraction, respectively.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction

