Coding of nonsense vs the detection of patterns
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
Published on: March 2, 2015
1Indiana University, 47405, Bloomington, Indiana.
Abstract:
Two theories are contrasted: coding information into arbitrary characters vs extracting patterns from a flux of stimulation. It is argued that coding is the process people use to memorize nonsense and, for that reason, is a poor model for the applied psychology of learning. The contrasting idea, that Ss perceive patterns and extract information. can be used to improve education by leading teachers to organize their material. It is also argued that most demonstrations of coding can be interpreted as examples of pattern perception.
Related Concept Videos
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay
Usually, Upf3 binds to an Exon Junction Complex (EJC) at mRNA splice sites. If a ribosome fully translates the mRNA,...
Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Signal Sequences and Sorting Receptors
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

