Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Preparation and Using Phantom Lesions to Practice Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies
Published on: September 29, 2009
Pitfalls in EUS FNA
Larissa L Fujii1, Michael J Levy
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Abstract:
Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a safe and accurate procedure, the diagnostic yield varies. Factors contributing to the diagnostic accuracy of EUS FNA include endosonographer and cytopathologist experience, EUS image recognition, accurate FNA targeting of the lesion, proper specimen collection and handling, use of ancillary techniques, and accurate cytologic interpretation. Errors in performance or judgment made before, during, or after the procedure may affect the results of the EUS FNA. The authors discuss the potential pitfalls of EUS FNA and methods to avoid their occurrence to optimize the diagnostic yield, efficiency, and safety of the procedure.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...

