Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Threats to Biodiversity01:50

Threats to Biodiversity

21.9K
There have been five major extinction events throughout geological history, resulting in the elimination of biodiversity, followed by a rebound of species that adapted to the new conditions. In the current geological epoch, the Holocene, there is a sixth extinction event in progress. This mass extinction has been attributed to human activities and is thus provisionally called the Anthropocene. In 2019 the human population reached 7.7 billion people and is projected to comprise 10 billion by...
21.9K
Habitat Fragmentation02:31

Habitat Fragmentation

15.8K
Habitat fragmentation describes the division of a more extensive, continuous habitat into smaller, discontinuous areas. Human activities such as land conversion, as well as slower geological processes leading to changes in the physical environment, are the two leading causes of habitat fragmentation. The fragmentation process typically follows the same steps: perforation, dissection, fragmentation, shrinkage, and attrition.
15.8K
Ecological Disturbance02:26

Ecological Disturbance

16.2K
An ecological disturbance is a temporary disruption in the environment resulting from abiotic, biotic, or anthropogenic factors, causing a pronounced change in an ecosystem. The impact of an ecological disturbance, which can depend on its intensity, frequency, and spatial distribution, plays a significant role in shaping the species diversity within the ecosystem.
16.2K
Environmental Influences on Intelligence01:29

Environmental Influences on Intelligence

1.2K
Despite the strong genetic influence on traits like intelligence, environmental factors significantly shape outcomes. For example, while over 90% of height variation is due to genetic differences, environmental factors such as nutrition also have a notable impact. Similarly, for intelligence, changes in a child's surroundings can significantly alter their IQ. Research shows that enriched environments boost children's academic success and help them develop key cognitive skills. Children...
1.2K
Global Regulatory Systems01:28

Global Regulatory Systems

961
Global regulatory systems in bacteria enable rapid and coordinated responses to environmental changes by integrating sensory inputs with gene expression, ensuring efficient adaptation to fluctuating conditions. Key global regulatory mechanisms include regulons, two-component systems, sigma factors, and secondary messengers.Regulons and Global RegulatorsA regulon is a collection of genes and operons controlled by a common global regulator. These regulators enable bacteria to prioritize resource...
961
Environmental Applications of Microorganisms01:30

Environmental Applications of Microorganisms

1.5K
Microorganisms play a pivotal role in maintaining ecosystem balance by recycling essential elements such as carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, as well as supporting processes like bioremediation, wastewater treatment, and biofuel production.Microbes in Elemental CyclesIn the carbon cycle, microorganisms decompose organic matter, releasing carbon dioxide via aerobic respiration. This carbon dioxide is subsequently used by photosynthetic organisms to synthesize organic compounds, closing the...
1.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modulation of cochlear tuning by low-frequency sound.

Hearing research·1988
Same journal

A study on greenhouse gas emissions from asphalt pavement cross-sections: a comparison between roadside and central areas.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2026
Same journal

Biosensing application of microbial fuel cells for organic matter and copper ion monitoring in constructed wetlands.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2026
Same journal

Microplastic accumulation in fish and water: a case study from a protected reservoir in a megacity.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2026
Same journal

Environmental assessment of Pb mobility in mining tailings from Zaruma, Ecuador, mediated by a Bacillus safensis group strain: a central composite design and generalized additive modeling approach.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2026
Same journal

Advancing CO<sub>2</sub> emission data quality in cement production through integrated material-, flue gas-, and 3D inventory-based monitoring.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2026
Same journal

Floating microplastics in semi-enclosed Boka Kotorska Bay (southern Adriatic Sea).

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

7.7K

Comparative environmental threat analysis: Three case studies.

J B Latour1, R Reiling

  • 1Laboratory for Soil and Groundwater Research, National Institute for Public Health and Environmental Protection, P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
|November 14, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Comparative threat analysis measures environmental problems using a common yardstick like carrying capacity. This study reviews operationalization and comparability, highlighting uncertainties and advocating for risk assessment to improve uniformity in environmental protection evaluations.

More Related Videos

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

14.6K
Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
08:14

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

Published on: April 28, 2023

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
12:44

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework

Published on: July 24, 2016

7.7K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

14.6K
Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans
08:14

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

Published on: April 28, 2023

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Risk Assessment
  • Ecology

Background:

  • Comparative threat analysis aims to quantify and rank environmental problems.
  • A common yardstick, such as environmental carrying capacity, is crucial for comparing threats.
  • Identifying key problems and problem areas requires a standardized assessment method.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the operationalization of carrying capacity for various environmental problems.
  • To discuss the feasibility and challenges of comparing environmental threats using carrying capacity.
  • To explore the uncertainties inherent in comparative threat analysis through case studies.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on the operationalization of carrying capacity.
  • Comparative analysis of environmental threats across different domains.
  • Case study analysis focusing on European groundwater, ecosystems, and Dutch environmental issues.

Main Results:

  • Carrying capacity operationalization varies significantly across different environmental problems.
  • Direct comparison of threats using exceeding carrying capacity reveals substantial uncertainties and methodological limitations.
  • Case studies illustrate the difficulties in establishing a uniform yardstick for diverse environmental threats.

Conclusions:

  • Current methods for comparative threat analysis using carrying capacity are fraught with uncertainties.
  • Risk assessment offers a more robust framework for methodological uniformity in evaluating environmental protection levels.
  • Standardizing assessment approaches is essential for effective environmental management and policy-making.