Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
The current status of bridging anticoagulation
1Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK.
Abstract:
For patients prescribed chronic vitamin K antagonist therapy requiring a surgical or invasive procedure, the question of whether or not to bridge and how to bridge is commonly encountered in clinical practice. Bridging anticoagulation has evolved over the years and the evidence base for current practice is deficient in many areas. Clinical trials currently being completed with conventional anticoagulants should help strengthen the evidence base for future practice. The availability of novel oral anticoagulants is a welcome addition, though their optimal management peri-procedure is yet to be determined. Prospective multi-centre controlled studies that can provide the evidence base for novel oral anticoagulant peri-procedural management are required.
Insights
Managing anticoagulation for patients undergoing surgery is complex. Current evidence for bridging anticoagulation is limited, especially for novel oral anticoagulants, necessitating further research.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Surgical Management
Background:
- Patients on chronic vitamin K antagonist therapy often require surgical or invasive procedures.
- Decisions regarding bridging anticoagulation are common but evidence-based guidelines are lacking.
- The introduction of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) presents new challenges in peri-procedural management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current clinical practice and evidence base for bridging anticoagulation in patients undergoing procedures.
- To highlight the deficiencies in current evidence, particularly concerning NOACs.
- To emphasize the need for prospective studies to guide peri-procedural management.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature and clinical practice guidelines.
- Analysis of the evolving landscape of anticoagulation therapies.
- Identification of research gaps in peri-procedural management.
Main Results:
- Current practices for bridging anticoagulation are not consistently supported by robust evidence.
- Significant gaps exist in understanding the optimal peri-procedural management of novel oral anticoagulants.
- Ongoing clinical trials with conventional anticoagulants may provide some future evidence.
Conclusions:
- Further high-quality, prospective, multi-center controlled studies are essential.
- Evidence is critically needed to establish best practices for peri-procedural management of both conventional and novel oral anticoagulants.
- Improved evidence will enhance patient safety and optimize anticoagulation management during invasive procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management

