Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Splenic artery aneurysm rupture: a rare but fatal cause for peripartum collapse.

Journal of intensive care medicine·2012
Same author

End-of-life care in ICU: a practical guide.

Journal of intensive care medicine·2011
Same author

A case of sudden desaturation and cyanosis.

Journal of hospital medicine·2009
Same author

A 44 year-old lady with chronic renal disease and intractable ulcers: a case report.

International archives of medicine·2009
Same author

End-of-life discussion: a concept or a treatment plan.

Critical care medicine·2009
Same author

Large-volume paracentesis: a fast, convenient, and safe technique.

The Journal of emergency medicine·2009

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy
05:03

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy

Published on: April 17, 2020

4.7K

Brain Death Determination.

Irene M Spinello1

  • 1David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA Department of Medicine, Kern Medical Center, Chief, Critical Care and Pulmonary Services. Bakersfield, CA, USA spinelloi@kernmedctr.com.

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
|November 15, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Brain death determination varies significantly among clinicians, despite established guidelines. This review clarifies brain death definitions, diagnostic pitfalls, and the determination process for medical professionals.

Keywords:
absent brain stem reflexesapnea testbrain deathirreversible brain injury

More Related Videos

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation
08:56

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation

Published on: March 15, 2024

2.4K
Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
12:28

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains

Published on: June 3, 2020

18.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy
05:03

Brain Death Induction in Mice Using Intra-Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring and Ventilation via Tracheostomy

Published on: April 17, 2020

4.7K
Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation
08:56

Study of Experimental Organ Donation Models for Lung Transplantation

Published on: March 15, 2024

2.4K
Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains
12:28

Abbiategrasso Brain Bank Protocol for Collecting, Processing and Characterizing Aging Brains

Published on: June 3, 2020

18.2K

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Forensic Medicine

Background:

  • Brain death accounts for 1-2% of US deaths annually.
  • Significant practice variations persist in determining brain death.
  • Previous guidelines (1995, 2010) have not fully standardized the process.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide bedside clinicians with a comprehensive overview of brain death.
  • To detail the definition, causes of misdiagnosis, and diagnostic pitfalls.
  • To focus on the specific procedures for determining brain death.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of existing practice parameters and guidelines.
  • Analysis of common causes and potential errors in brain death diagnosis.
  • Synthesis of best practices for clinical determination.

Main Results:

  • Highlights inconsistencies in current brain death determination practices.
  • Identifies key challenges and potential errors in the diagnostic process.
  • Emphasizes the need for standardized clinical application of guidelines.

Conclusions:

  • Consistent application of brain death determination protocols is crucial.
  • Understanding diagnostic pitfalls can improve accuracy and reduce errors.
  • This review serves as a practical guide for clinicians.