Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.2K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.2K
Valence Bond Theory02:42

Valence Bond Theory

8.9K
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
8.9K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.5K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.2K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.2K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.3K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.3K
Structures of Solids02:22

Structures of Solids

18.0K
Solids in which the atoms, ions, or molecules are arranged in a definite repeating pattern are known as crystalline solids. Metals and ionic compounds typically form ordered, crystalline solids. A crystalline solid has a precise melting temperature because each atom or molecule of the same type is held in place with the same forces or energy. Amorphous solids or non-crystalline solids (or, sometimes, glasses) which lack an ordered internal structure and are randomly arranged. Substances that...
18.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Role of transcriptional bursts in cellular oscillations.

Journal of theoretical biology·2017
Same author

Effects of time-delayed feedback on the properties of self-sustained oscillators.

Physical review. E·2016
Same author

Epidemic thresholds for bipartite networks.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2013
Same author

Directed transport induced by α-stable Lévy noises in weakly asymmetric periodic potentials.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2013
Same author

Dynamical heterogeneities as fingerprints of a backbone structure in Potts models.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2012
Same author

Relationship between clustering coefficient and the success of cooperation in networks.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

9.9K

Backbone structure of the Edwards-Anderson spin-glass model.

F Romá1, S Risau-Gusman

  • 1Departamento de Física, INFAP, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Chacabuco 917, D5700BWS San Luis, Argentina.

Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
|November 16, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Researchers studied spatial variations in the Edwards-Anderson spin-glass model. They found the backbone structure is similar for discrete and continuous bond distributions, influencing spin-glass properties.

More Related Videos

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

9.3K
Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

9.9K
Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

9.3K
Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Condensed matter physics
  • Statistical mechanics
  • Disordered systems

Background:

  • Spin-glass models exhibit complex ground-state properties due to quenched disorder.
  • Understanding spatial heterogeneities is crucial for characterizing spin-glass behavior.
  • Previous studies often focused on discrete bond distributions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate ground-state spatial heterogeneities in the Edwards-Anderson spin-glass model.
  • To generalize the concept of a 'backbone' to continuous bond distributions.
  • To analyze the influence of these heterogeneities on equilibrium properties.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a general definition of bond rigidity to classify bonds.
  • Employed extensive numerical simulations.
  • Analyzed topological structures and equilibrium properties at finite temperatures.

Main Results:

  • Identified distinct properties between backbone and complement bond sets.
  • Demonstrated topological similarity of the backbone for discrete and continuous distributions across lattice dimensions.
  • Observed significant influence of heterogeneities on finite-temperature equilibrium properties.

Conclusions:

  • The backbone concept provides a useful framework for understanding spin-glass heterogeneities.
  • The topological similarity suggests a universal aspect of the backbone structure.
  • The backbone picture may be relevant for describing general spin-glass phenomena.