Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Preventing the Spread of Malaria and Dengue Fever Using Genetically Modified Mosquitoes
Published on: July 4, 2007
Expert consensus-building for developing guidelines: lessons learned from a dengue economics workshop
Dagna Constenla1, Noah Lefcourt, Cristina Garcia
1Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Developing a standardized economic cost assessment for dengue requires diverse expert input and structured collaboration. Key success factors included multidisciplinary engagement and clear communication strategies for effective methodology development.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Dengue poses a significant global health and economic burden.
- Standardized methodologies for assessing the economic cost of dengue are lacking.
- Previous cost assessments may suffer from bias and lack of integration.
Purpose of the Study:
- To discuss and develop a standardized methodology for assessing the economic cost of dengue.
- To identify factors contributing to the success of expert workshops for methodology development.
- To address challenges and suggest improvements for future collaborative efforts.
Main Methods:
- Convened a two-and-a-half-day workshop in March 2012.
- Included 20 experts from diverse backgrounds across five countries in the Americas.
- Facilitated guided small- and large-group discussions.
- Employed strategies to foster cross-cultural collaboration, trust, and communication.
Main Results:
- Identified key factors contributing to workshop success: early expert engagement, multidisciplinary approach, structured discussions, and clear responsibilities.
- Highlighted the importance of breaking down complex issues and providing pre-workshop materials.
- Acknowledged challenges and areas for future improvement in methodology development.
Conclusions:
- Successful development of standardized health economic methodologies relies on careful planning and execution of expert workshops.
- Multidisciplinary collaboration and effective communication are crucial for robust and comprehensive assessments.
- The described factors provide a framework for optimizing future international expert collaborations in public health research.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Introduction to Epidemiology
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

