Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Sleep regularity in shiftwork: A missing metric for fatigue risk management?

Sleep medicine reviews·2025

Same author

How should we manage fatigue in on-call workers? A review of guidance materials and a systematic review of the evidence-base.

Sleep medicine reviews·2024

Same author

Perception versus Reality: The Relationship between Subjective and Objective Measures of Sleep When On-call under Simulated Laboratory Conditions.

Behavioral sleep medicine·2020

Same author

How to keep the mini c-arm laser positional crosshair lit throughout a procedure.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2020

Same author

Waking qEEG to assess psychophysiological stress and alertness during simulated on-call conditions.

International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology·2019

Same author

An EMG-driven biomechanical model of the canine cervical spine.

Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology·2017

Same journal

Are There Differences in Return-to-Work Experiences for Workers Who Acquired COVID-19 at Work Compared to Workers who Sustained a Non-COVID-19 Work-Related Injury or Illness?

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026

Same journal

Association Between Mental Health of Patients with Work-Related Injury and Their Compensation Claim Status: Exploratory Findings from the IMPRovE Trial.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026

Same journal

Longterm Persistence and Scalability of a Coordinated Return to Work Model in Healthcare: A Registry-Based Study Across Clinical Pathways.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026

Same journal

Supporting Work Participation in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Disorders: Outcomes from Work-Able Solutions a Multisite Work-Focused Occupational Therapy Intervention.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026

Same journal

Cost-Consequence Analysis of the Return to Work (RTW) Program for Workers with Disabilities in Indonesia: Health, Economic and Productivity Outcomes.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026

Same journal

Effectiveness of the Participatory Approach on Return-to-Work of Sick-Listed Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Published on: December 13, 2024

Dynamic low back functional motion capacity evaluation.

S A Ferguson¹, W S Marras, R R Crowell

¹Biodynamics Laboratory, The Ohio State University, 1971 Neil Avenue, 43210, Columbus, Ohio.

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

|November 16, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Dynamic functional capacity in low back pain patients is better assessed using motion velocity and acceleration, not just range of motion. These measures, including coupled motion, significantly differentiate patients from controls.

More Related Videos

Measurements of Motor Function and Other Clinical Outcome Parameters in Ambulant Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Measurements of Motor Function and Other Clinical Outcome Parameters in Ambulant Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Published on: January 12, 2019

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography

Published on: January 12, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation

Published on: December 13, 2024

Measurements of Motor Function and Other Clinical Outcome Parameters in Ambulant Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Measurements of Motor Function and Other Clinical Outcome Parameters in Ambulant Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

Published on: January 12, 2019

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Remote Rehabilitation with Virtual Reality and Electromyography

Published on: January 12, 2024

Area of Science:

Biomechanics
Musculoskeletal Health
Rehabilitation Science

Background:

Current functional capacity evaluations often rely on range of motion and strength.
Limited understanding exists regarding dynamic functional motion capacity in individuals with low back pain across different planes of movement.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare dynamic functional motion capacity in the three cardinal planes between individuals with and without low back pain.
To investigate if injury affects sagittal, lateral, and twisting spinal motions.

Main Methods:

Twenty-six age and gender-matched controls and low back pain patients were assessed.
Trunk motion parameters (range of motion, velocity, acceleration) were measured in all three planes.
Subjects performed tasks eliciting motion in each cardinal plane.

Main Results:

Controls demonstrated significantly higher velocity and acceleration than low back pain patients across all planes.
Range of motion did not significantly differ between groups.
Velocity and acceleration parameters were more effective than ROM in distinguishing between groups.

Conclusions:

Dynamic motion parameters like velocity and acceleration, alongside coupled motion analysis, offer superior differentiation between low back pain patients and controls compared to traditional ROM measures.
These findings suggest novel methods for evaluating functional capacity and patient recovery.