Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Universal Screening for Prevention of Reading, Writing, and Math Disabilities in Spanish
Published on: July 18, 2020
Screening for reading problems: The utility of SEARCH
D Morrison1, P Mantzicopoulos, E Stone
1University of California, San Francisco.
Insights
The SEARCH screening tool shows 77% accuracy in predicting reading skills but over-identifies children. Many identified as at risk by SEARCH later achieved adequate reading skills.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Educational Psychology
- Screening Tools in Education
Background:
- Early identification of learning problems is crucial for timely intervention.
- Screening tools aim to identify at-risk children for further assessment.
- The SEARCH tool's efficacy in predicting reading difficulties requires validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the predictive accuracy of the SEARCH screening tool for learning problems.
- To determine if SEARCH accurately identifies kindergarten children at risk for reading difficulties.
- To examine the relationship between SEARCH scores and information processing skills.
Main Methods:
- 1107 kindergarten children were evaluated using the SEARCH screening tool.
- Children were categorized based on preacademic achievement scores (below/above third stanine).
- Reading tests were administered to a subset of at-risk children in first and second grade.
Main Results:
- SEARCH identified 26% of children as at risk; accuracy in predicting reading skills was 77%.
- Approximately 50% of children flagged by SEARCH demonstrated adequate reading skills.
- At first and second grade, 39% and 66% of SEARCH-identified children, respectively, performed at grade level.
- Children from higher socioeconomic status (SES) were less likely to be identified as at risk by SEARCH.
Conclusions:
- The SEARCH tool has moderate accuracy but a notable over-identification rate for children at risk for learning problems.
- A significant proportion of children identified as at risk by SEARCH achieve adequate reading skills, suggesting potential for false positives.
- Further research is needed to refine screening methods and address potential socioeconomic biases in identification.
Abstract:
To evaluate the accuracy of SEARCH as a screen for identifying children at risk for developing learning problems, 1107 kindergarten children were evaluated with SEARCH and 284 (26 percent) were classified as at risk. At-risk children were of average intelligence and SEARCH scores were significantly correlated with sequential and simultaneous information processing skills. Children whose group preacademic achievement scores were at or below the third stanine at the end of kindergarten were classified as having inadequate skills for learning how to read; those scoring above the third stanine formed the adequate skills group. Using this criterion, SEARCH predicted children who had adequate or inadequate preacademic reading skills with 77 percent accuracy. However, approximately half of the children identified as at risk by SEARCH performed adequately. A reading test was individually administered to a group of at-risk children at the end of first (N=49) and second (N=35) grade. Of those children identified at risk by SEARCH at kindergarten, 39 percent at first grade and 66 percent at second grade performed at grade level. Fewer children from the upper SES were identified by SEARCH as being at risk.
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which...
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...

