Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impaired trunk sensorimotor control during isometric force reproduction involving rotation and extension in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

North American Spine Society journal·2026
Same author

The state of motor neural networks in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The journal of pain·2026
Same author

Factors influencing corticomuscular coherence for axial and lower limb musculature in a healthy population: a scoping review.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

Enhanced vestibular-evoked balance responses in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Journal of neurophysiology·2025
Same author

Tactile contribution extends beyond exteroception during spatially guided finger movements.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Balance control threshold to vestibular stimuli.

The Journal of physiology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
07:30

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations

Published on: May 1, 2018

14.8K

Lower-Limb Power cannot be Estimated Accurately from Vertical Jump Tests.

Jean-François Tessier1, Fabien-A Basset, Martin Simoneau

  • 1Faculty of Medicine - Department of Kinesiology, Laval University, Québec, Canada. ; Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Centre d'excellence sur le vieillissement de Québec, Québec, Canada.

Journal of Human Kinetics
|November 16, 2013
PubMed
Summary

The countermovement jump test may not accurately assess lower-limb power. Large discrepancies were found between measured and predicted power, raising concerns for its use in monitoring athletic performance.

Keywords:
Countermovement jumpforceminimal differencevalidity

More Related Videos

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
06:36

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Published on: April 15, 2020

8.2K
An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

10.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
07:30

Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations

Published on: May 1, 2018

14.8K
Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants
06:36

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

Published on: April 15, 2020

8.2K
An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
06:52

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field

Published on: May 26, 2020

10.1K

Area of Science:

  • Sports Science
  • Biomechanics
  • Human Movement Analysis

Background:

  • The countermovement jump (CMJ) test is widely used to assess lower-limb power.
  • Accurate monitoring of power requires understanding the minimal detectable difference.
  • Previous validity studies on CMJ have not sufficiently addressed this minimal difference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the minimal difference in power required to confidently distinguish between individuals.
  • To compare power outputs derived from ground reaction forces (GRF) versus predictive equations.
  • To evaluate the reliability of CMJ for assessing and monitoring lower-limb power.

Main Methods:

  • Measured lower-limb power using ground reaction forces (GRF) during countermovement jumps.
  • Calculated power using established predictive equations.
  • Determined jump height using kinematic techniques.
  • Compared GRF-derived power with predicted power in trained and highly trained groups.

Main Results:

  • A significant discrepancy exists between power calculated from GRF and predictive equations.
  • For trained individuals, R-squared was 0.53, with a minimal detectable difference of 821.7 W.
  • For highly trained individuals, R-squared was 0.94, but the minimal detectable difference remained large at 689.3 W.

Conclusions:

  • The large minimal detectable differences raise concerns about the utility of CMJ for precise lower-limb power assessment.
  • Current CMJ protocols may lack the sensitivity to detect meaningful changes in power.
  • Further research is needed to refine CMJ analysis for reliable power monitoring.