Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic
Erin Holve1, Marianne Hamilton Lopez, Lisa Scott
1AcademyHealth, 1150 17th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036, USA.
Stakeholders expect electronic clinical data (ECD) to advance comparative effectiveness research (CER), but face challenges in data quality, governance, and defining patient-centeredness. A culture shift is needed for collaborative science and useful research dissemination.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Biomedical Informatics
- Translational Science
Background:
- The AcademyHealth Electronic Data Methods Forum fosters dialogue on using electronic clinical data (ECD) for comparative effectiveness research (CER), patient-centered outcomes research, and quality improvement.
- A mixed-method needs assessment was conducted to understand stakeholder perspectives on ECD infrastructure, knowledge gaps in CER, and learning health system expectations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess stakeholder views on developing infrastructure for CER using ECD.
- To identify current knowledge gaps in CER.
- To understand stakeholder expectations for a learning health system.
Main Methods:
- Conducted 50 semi-structured stakeholder interviews across seven groups (government, business/payer, industry, healthcare delivery, patient/consumer, nonprofit/policy, research) from August to November 2011.
- Utilized a semi-structured interview guide and a short survey.
- Employed NVivo software for qualitative data analysis of transcripts and integrated quantitative survey data.
Main Results:
- Stakeholders have high expectations for CER using ECD to overcome traditional research limitations and generate decision-making evidence.
- Key challenges identified include developing governance, ensuring data quality, and addressing confounding in observational data.
- Defining 'patient-centeredness' in CER using ECD remains complex; improving translation and dissemination of CER is crucial for mitigating negative perceptions and fostering a 'culture shift' towards collaborative science.
Conclusions:
- Stakeholders recognize the potential of ECD for CER but highlight significant challenges in implementation, data quality, and conceptualization.
- Addressing these challenges requires developing appropriate governance, robust methods, and a cultural shift towards collaborative research.
- Effective translation and dissemination of CER findings are essential for practical application and improving public perception.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...