Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
05:52

Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.0K

Comparative effectiveness research in spine surgery.

Wendell B Lake1, Nathaniel P Brooks, Daniel K Resnick

  • 1University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, Department of Neurological Surgery, Madison, WI, USA.

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
|November 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What is the prevalence of contraindications to cervical arthroplasty among operative degenerative spine cases at an academic center?

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

Early reactivation of medial temporal lobe neurons during emergence from propofol anesthesia in neurosurgical patients.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Postoperative opioid utilization following uniportal endoscopic versus open microscopic lumbar discectomy.

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine·2026
Same author

Risk Factors for Operative Adjacent Segment Disease Following Laminectomy Without Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Connections and Community in Neurosurgery.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Complications of spine surgery.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same journal

Access in all areas? A round-up of developments in market access and health technology assessment: part 15.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2026
Same journal

Healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with multiple myeloma administered ciltacabtagene autoleucel in outpatient versus inpatient settings after one to three prior lines of therapy.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2026
Same journal

Considerations for assessing the feasibility of network meta-analysis of seasonal vaccines.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2026
Same journal

Covariate selection and adjustment for efficacy and safety endpoints in indirect comparative effectiveness analyses of CAR-T-cell therapies for large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2026
Same journal

Acthar Gel treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or dermatomyositis/polymyositis: analysis of physician-reported charts.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2026
Same journal

Use of intracardiac echocardiography and three-dimensional mapping during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with reduced complications: a retrospective analysis of United States Medicare Fee-For-Service Database.

Journal of comparative effectiveness research·2026
See all related articles

Degenerative spine disorders pose significant challenges. Comparative effectiveness research utilizing spine registries is crucial for optimizing patient treatment and managing healthcare costs.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Spine Surgery
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Degenerative spine disorders are a major cause of patient morbidity and healthcare expenditure.
  • There is increasing pressure for cost control and improved patient outcomes in healthcare.
  • Evidence-based medicine and comparative effectiveness research are gaining prominence in spine research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the role of spine registries in advancing evidence-based medicine for degenerative spine disorders.
  • To emphasize the importance of comparative effectiveness research in determining optimal treatment paradigms.
  • To discuss how evolving healthcare systems can leverage registry data for better clinical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the role of established spine registries (e.g., Swedish Spine Registry, Scoliosis Research Society Registry).

More Related Videos

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
04:19

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device

Published on: November 8, 2024

1.8K
An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
09:07

An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model

Published on: May 31, 2017

7.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
05:52

Novel Mini-open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Published on: June 6, 2025

1.0K
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
04:19

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device

Published on: November 8, 2024

1.8K
An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
09:07

An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model

Published on: May 31, 2017

7.4K
  • Discussion of the increasing involvement of professional spine surgery organizations in data collection.
  • Focus on procedural- and diagnosis-based registries for therapeutic outcome assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • Spine registries provide valuable data for comparative effectiveness research.
    • Professional organizations are actively developing registries to track treatment outcomes.
    • Data from registries can inform clinical choices for challenging spinal conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Comparative effectiveness research, driven by spine registries, is essential for optimizing care for degenerative spine disorders.
    • These registries are vital tools for navigating complex clinical decisions in spine care.
    • The evolution of healthcare systems necessitates the use of robust data from spine registries to guide treatment choices.