Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

422
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
422
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

631
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
631
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

726
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
726
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.7K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.7K
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches01:28

Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches

605
Designing a dosage regimen, which refers to the manner of drug administration, is a complex process involving the selection of drug dose, route, and frequency. This process is underpinned by pharmacokinetic parameters derived from tests and population averages. These parameters are then tailored to patient-specific variables such as diagnosis, demographics, and allergy status. Once therapy commences, therapeutic response monitoring is critical and achieved through clinical and physical...
605
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

74
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
74

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Personalizing N-of-1 Trial Results to Facilitate Decision-Making.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias and outmigration of older Puerto Rican Medicare Fee-for-service beneficiaries, 2012-2019.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2026
Same author

Digital N-of-1 trials and their application in experimental physiology.

Experimental physiology·2026
Same author

Selected Impacts of Urban Heat Islands on Emergency Medical Services Utilization in Rhode Island.

The western journal of emergency medicine·2026
Same author

Global Sensitivity Analysis for Studies Extending Inferences From a Randomized Trial to a Target Population.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Estimating the Effects of MTEER in U.S. Practice: A Transportability Analysis of the COAPT Trial.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

3.3K

Modernizing the systematic review process to inform comparative effectiveness: tools and methods.

Byron C Wallace1, Issa J Dahabreh, Christopher H Schmid

  • 1Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Program in Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, USA.

Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
|November 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic reviews are crucial for healthcare decisions but are becoming more challenging to produce. Modernizing the review process is essential to manage increasing literature and complexity, ensuring reliable evidence.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

3.3K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.4K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Research
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Biomedical Informatics

Background:

  • Systematic reviews are vital for evidence-based healthcare, informing clinical practice and policy.
  • Their importance is growing, but producing and updating them is increasingly difficult.
  • Exponential literature growth, complex research questions, and rigorous standards contribute to this challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the growing challenges in systematic review production and maintenance.
  • To advocate for prioritizing systematic review questions and optimizing research synthesis.
  • To emphasize the need for modernization to enhance transparency, reliability, and validity.

Main Methods:

  • The abstract discusses the increasing demands on systematic reviews.
  • It identifies key challenges: literature expansion, complex questions, and higher standards.
  • It proposes solutions focused on prioritization and process optimization.

Main Results:

  • Systematic reviews face significant workload increases.
  • The complexity and rigor of systematic reviews are escalating.
  • Current methods are becoming unsustainable without adaptation.

Conclusions:

  • Prioritizing systematic review questions is crucial.
  • Optimizing research synthesis processes is necessary.
  • Modernizing systematic reviews is essential for continued relevance and reliability in healthcare.