Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Pathogen Detection and Disease Assessment in Real-Time Using M-ROSE
Published on: March 1, 2024
[Investigation of Pneumocystis jirovecii in clinical specimens by different methods]
F Filiz Tekinşen1, A Nedret Koç
1Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Kayseri, Turkey. anedret@erciyes.edu.tr.
Insights
Diagnosing Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in immunocompromised patients requires multiple tests. Combining Giemsa staining, DFA, PCR, and BDG tests improves diagnostic accuracy for Pneumocystis jirovecii.
Area of Science:
- Medical Mycology
- Infectious Diseases
- Diagnostic Microbiology
Background:
- Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) presents a high mortality risk in immunocompromised individuals, including transplant recipients, AIDS patients, and those undergoing chemotherapy.
- Accurate and timely diagnosis of PCP is crucial for effective treatment and improved patient outcomes.
- Current diagnostic methods for PCP have varying sensitivities and specificities, necessitating evaluation of combined approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic utility of Giemsa staining (GS), direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) assay, (1→3)-β-D-Glucan (BDG) test, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting Pneumocystis jirovecii.
- To compare the performance of these diagnostic methods in patients suspected of having PCP.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of respiratory samples (bronchoalveolar lavage, endotracheal aspirate, etc.) and serum samples from 100 PCP-suspected patients using GS, DFA, PCR, and BDG tests.
- Comparison of diagnostic test results, including calculation of agreement (kappa values) and performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity) using DFA as a reference standard.
- Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis for the BDG test using DFA and BAL-PCR as gold standards.
Main Results:
- Giemsa staining and DFA showed high agreement (κ=1), while agreements between PCR and DFA (κ=0.38), DFA and BDG (κ=0.07), and BAL-PCR and BDG (κ=0.28) were low.
- Using DFA as the gold standard, GS demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity, PCR showed 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity, and BDG had 100% sensitivity and 67% specificity.
- Combined testing, particularly GS and DFA, yielded high specificity (100%), while the addition of PCR and BDG elevated sensitivity to 93% for diagnosing PCP.
Conclusions:
- No single diagnostic test is sufficient for the accurate laboratory diagnosis of Pneumocystis jirovecii.
- A combination of diagnostic methods, including Giemsa staining, DFA, PCR, and BDG testing, is recommended to enhance the sensitivity and specificity of PCP diagnosis.
- The study highlights the importance of integrating multiple diagnostic strategies for improved detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii in at-risk patient populations.
Abstract:
Pneumocystis jirovecii causes pneumonia in premature, newborn or malnourished children, as well as in immunocompromised subjects such as chemotherapy receiving, transplant and AIDS patients. Since the mortality and morbidity rates of Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in these patients were high, rapid and accurate diagnosis is important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of Giemsa staining (GS), direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) assay, (1→3)-β-D-Glucan (BDG) test and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of P.jirovecii in clinical specimens. A total of 100 PCP-suspected patients with underlying diseases who were followed-up in outpatient and inpatient clinics of our hospital between December 2008-July 2010 were included in the study. All the patients (66 male, 34 female; mean age: 42.04 years) were under long-term immunosuppressive drug therapy due to their hematological malignancies, kidney transplantation, neutropenia or chronic diseases. Respiratory samples [86 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), 8 endotracheal aspirate, 1 nasotracheal aspirate, 3 pleural, 2 lung biopsy samples] obtained from the patients have been studied with GS (Merck, Germany), DFA (Pneumo Cel, Cellabs, Australia) and PCR (primers targeting MSG gene, LightCycler, Roche, USA), while serum samples (n= 100) with BDG (Fungitell, ACC Inc, USA) and PCR methods. In BAL samples two were found positive by GS, DFA and PCR, and six were positive only by PCR, yielding a total positivity in 8 (8%) samples. All of the sera were negative with PCR, however 29 of them were positive (> 80 pg/ml), five were equivocal (61-79 pg/ml) and 66 were negative (< 60 pg/ml) with BDG test. Eight patients with positive results in BAL-PCR were also positive with BDG test. Although the agreement between GS and DFA was high (κ= 1), it was observed as low between PCR and DFA (κ= 0.38), DFA and BDG (κ= 0.07), BAL-PCR and BDG (κ= 0.28). DFA taken as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity values of GS, PCR and BDG methods were calculated as 100% and 100%; 100% and 93%; 100% and 67%, respectively. In the ROC analysis performed for BDG test, with DFA and BAL-PCR taken as the gold standards, the sensitivity, specificity and cut-off values of BDG were estimated as 100%, 93.9% and 494 pg/ml, and 100%, 72.8% and 62 pg/ml, respectively. Our data indicated that, overall specificity was high (100%) when using GS and DFA tests together, while the sensitivity has been elevated to 93% with the additional use of PCR and BDG tests, in the diagnosis of PCP-suspected patients. In conclusion, combination of all these tests should be performed for the laboratory diagnosis of P.jirovecii.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Atypical Pneumonia
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...
Pneumonia I: Introduction
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

