Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

OP-IVM: Combining In vitro Maturation after Oocyte Retrieval with Gynecological Surgery
Published on: May 9, 2021
Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for repeated IVF/ICSI failure and unexplained infertility: a systematic review
Jie Li1, Yang Chen, Chengjun Liu
1Guangxi Reproductive Medical Research Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been introduced empirically into IVF/ICSI programs with the hopes of improving in vitro fertilization (IVF) success. However, the effects of IVIG have been inconsistent. We investigated the effects of IVIG on hard outcomes, including implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate per embryo transferred. The PubMed, EMBASE, and CNKI databases were searched up to June of 2013 and 10 studies were included. Case-controlled studies comparing IVIG with placebo in IVF/ICSI women and/or unexplained infertility were included. Using fixed and random effects models, the pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The use of IVIG was significantly associated with a higher implantation rate and RR was 2.708 (95%CI: 1.302-5.629) compared with the placebo. The clinical pregnancy rate and the live birth rate were significantly increased in patients randomized to IVIG; RR was 1.475 (95%CI: 1.191-1.825) for the clinical pregnancy rate and RR was 1.616 (95%CI: 1.243-2.101) for the live birth rate. Moreover, the miscarriage rate was significantly less in patients randomized to IVIG (0.352, 95%CI: 0.168-0.738), but the live birthrate per embryo transferred was not (2.893; 95%CI: 0.810-10.331) less. Our results strongly support that IVIG is a useful treatment option for women undergoing repeated IVF failure.
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been introduced empirically into IVF/ICSI programs with the hopes of improving in vitro fertilization (IVF) success. However, the effects of IVIG have been inconsistent. We investigated the effects of IVIG on hard outcomes, including implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate per embryo transferred. The PubMed, EMBASE, and CNKI databases were searched up to June of 2013 and 10 studies were included. Case-controlled studies comparing IVIG with placebo in IVF/ICSI women and/or unexplained infertility were included. Using fixed and random effects models, the pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The use of IVIG was significantly associated with a higher implantation rate and RR was 2.708 (95%CI: 1.302-5.629) compared with the placebo. The clinical pregnancy rate and the live birth rate were significantly increased in patients randomized to IVIG; RR was 1.475 (95%CI: 1.191-1.825) for the clinical pregnancy rate and RR was 1.616 (95%CI: 1.243-2.101) for the live birth rate. Moreover, the miscarriage rate was significantly less in patients randomized to IVIG (0.352, 95%CI: 0.168-0.738), but the live birthrate per embryo transferred was not (2.893; 95%CI: 0.810-10.331) less. Our results strongly support that IVIG is a useful treatment option for women undergoing repeated IVF failure.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
In Vitro Fertilization
The IVF process begins with ovarian stimulation, during which reproductive endocrinologists prescribe hormonal medications to stimulate the ovaries to produce multiple eggs instead of the single...
Infertility in Females
Endometriosis, a condition characterized by abnormal growth of...
Infertility in Males
Meiosis II

