Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.5K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.5K
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview01:12

Double Resonance Techniques: Overview

874
Double resonance techniques in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectroscopy involve the simultaneous application of two different frequencies or radiofrequency pulses to manipulate and observe two distinct nuclear spins. One important application of double resonance is spin decoupling, which selectively suppresses coupling with one type of nucleus while observing the NMR signal from another nucleus, simplifying the spectrum and enhancing resolution.
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
874
Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement (NOE)01:06

Nuclear Overhauser Enhancement (NOE)

1.3K
Irradiation of a spin-active nucleus causes an increase or decrease in the signal intensity of neighboring nuclei that are not necessarily chemically bonded or involved in J-coupling. This phenomenon, called the nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE), results from through-space interactions between the nuclear spins. The NOE effect decreases with increasing internuclear distance and is generally not observed beyond 4 angstroms. In NOE, dipole-dipole interactions between neighboring spin-active...
1.3K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.5K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.5K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.3K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.3K
Insensitive Nuclei Enhanced by Polarization Transfer (INEPT)01:15

Insensitive Nuclei Enhanced by Polarization Transfer (INEPT)

1.2K
Insensitive Nuclei Enhanced by Polarization Transfer (INEPT) is an advanced Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) technique specifically designed to detect and enhance the signals of low-abundance nuclei, such as carbon-13 and nitrogen-15, in small molecules. The fundamental principle behind INEPT is the transfer of polarization from a more abundant and highly polarizable nucleus, typically hydrogen-1, to the low-abundance nucleus of interest. This process effectively boosts the NMR signal of the...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inverting CEST or <math><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>R</mi> <mrow><mn>1</mn> <mi>ρ</mi></mrow></msub></mrow> <annotation>$$ {R}_{1\uprho} $$</annotation></semantics></math> data to generate solute spectra without a priori assumptions.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2025
Same author

Joint estimation of compartment-specific T<sub>2</sub> relaxation and tumor microstructure using multi-TE IMPULSED MRI.

Magnetic resonance in medicine·2024
Same author

The State-of-the-Art of Patient Portals: Adapting to External Factors, Addressing Barriers, and Innovating.

Applied clinical informatics·2023
Same author

Toward the use of MRI measurements of bound and pore water in fracture risk assessment.

Bone·2023
Same author

Experimental demonstration of diffusion limitations on resolution and SNR in MR microscopy.

Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)·2023
Same author

Detection of Treatment Response in Triple-Negative Breast Tumors to Paclitaxel Using MRI Cell Size Imaging.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

19.6K

Exchange-mediated contrast in CEST and spin-lock imaging.

Jared Guthrie Cobb1, Ke Li, Jingping Xie

  • 1Vanderbilt University Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|November 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) and rotating frame spin-lattice relaxation rate (R1ρ) MRI contrast depend on proton exchange. CEST excels with large frequency offsets, while R1ρ is better for small offsets, offering complementary tissue information.

Keywords:
CESTChemical exchangeR(1ρ)Spin lock

More Related Videos

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

9.9K
Electron Channeling Contrast Imaging for Rapid III-V Heteroepitaxial Characterization
07:50

Electron Channeling Contrast Imaging for Rapid III-V Heteroepitaxial Characterization

Published on: July 17, 2015

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes
11:44

Spin Saturation Transfer Difference NMR SSTD NMR: A New Tool to Obtain Kinetic Parameters of Chemical Exchange Processes

Published on: November 12, 2016

19.6K
Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

9.9K
Electron Channeling Contrast Imaging for Rapid III-V Heteroepitaxial Characterization
07:50

Electron Channeling Contrast Imaging for Rapid III-V Heteroepitaxial Characterization

Published on: July 17, 2015

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Biophysical Chemistry

Background:

  • Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) and rotating frame spin-lattice relaxation rate (R1ρ) MRI contrast are influenced by chemical exchange between water and other protons.
  • These exchange processes, particularly at high magnetic fields, can be leveraged for novel contrast mechanisms in biological imaging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the factors modulating exchange contrast for CEST and R1ρ MRI.
  • To analyze the differences in contrast generation between CEST and R1ρ methods using simulations and experimental data.

Main Methods:

  • Performed simulations and experimental measurements at 9.4 T.
  • Investigated rotating frame relaxation rate dispersion and CEST contrast on macromolecule solutions with amide and hydroxyl protons.

Main Results:

  • Both CEST and R1ρ measurements depend on similar exchange parameters but yield different contrast effects.
  • CEST contrast is higher for large frequency offsets (>2 ppm) in slow/intermediate exchange, while R1ρ contrast is enhanced at small offsets (<2 ppm) in intermediate/fast exchange.
  • Image contrast scales differently with field strength, exchange rate, and concentration for the two methods.

Conclusions:

  • CEST and R1ρ MRI provide distinct yet complementary information regarding proton exchange in biological tissues.
  • CEST imaging can visualize protons based on their chemical shifts.
  • R1ρ-based acquisitions can selectively highlight protons characterized by specific exchange rates.