Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components01:23

Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components

1.6K
Curvilinear motion characterizes the movement of a particle or object along a curved path, notably evident when envisioning a car navigating a winding road. If the car starts at point A, its position vector is established within a fixed frame of reference, where the ratio of the position vector to its magnitude signifies the unit vector pointing in the position vector's direction.
As the car advances, its position evolves over time. Quantifying the car's velocity involves computing the...
1.6K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.7K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.7K
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion01:24

Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion

756
Visualize a drone, with its propellers spinning rapidly, hovering mid-air. The fascinating movements and operations of this drone can be comprehended by applying the principle of general plane motion.
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
756
Curvilinear Motion: Normal and Tangential Components01:27

Curvilinear Motion: Normal and Tangential Components

1.2K
When a car traverses a curved road, its motion can be elucidated by breaking it down into tangential and normal components. The car-centric coordinates attached to the vehicle move with it.
The positive direction of the t-axis aligns with the increasing position of the car along the curved path, denoted by the unit vector ut. Simultaneously, the n-axis, perpendicular to the t-axis, dissects the curved path into differential arc segments, each forming the arc of a circle with a radius of...
1.2K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

1.1K
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
1.1K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

844
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
844

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of Competition on Left Prefrontal and Temporal Cortex During Conceptual Comparison of Brand-Name Product Pictures: Analysis of fNIRS Using Tensor Decomposition.

Brain sciences·2025
Same author

New Framework for Understanding Cross-Brain Coherence in Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Hyperscanning Studies.

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE·2023
Same author

Exploring the feasibility of tensor decomposition for analysis of fNIRS signals: a comparative study with grand averaging method.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2023
Same author

When I move, you move: Associations between automatic and person-coded measures of infant-mother synchrony during free-play using virtual in-home data collection.

Infant behavior & development·2023
Same author

Longer looking to agent with false belief at 7 but not 6 months of age.

Infant and child development·2022
Same author

Cortical Activation to Social and Mechanical Stimuli in the Infant Brain.

Frontiers in systems neuroscience·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.4K

Infants' ability to extract three-dimensional shape from coherent motion.

Amy Hirshkowitz1, Teresa Wilcox

  • 1Texas A&M University, United States.

Infant Behavior & Development
|November 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Infants can perceive 3D shapes from motion cues alone. This study shows 4.5 and 9-month-olds distinguish novel three-dimensional (3D) forms from familiar ones using structure-from-motion (SFM) displays.

Keywords:
Eye-trackingInfantsStructure-from-motion

More Related Videos

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

10.3K
A View of Their Own: Capturing the Egocentric View of Infants and Toddlers with Head-Mounted Cameras
03:56

A View of Their Own: Capturing the Egocentric View of Infants and Toddlers with Head-Mounted Cameras

Published on: October 5, 2018

7.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.4K
Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
11:18

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task

Published on: June 1, 2015

10.3K
A View of Their Own: Capturing the Egocentric View of Infants and Toddlers with Head-Mounted Cameras
03:56

A View of Their Own: Capturing the Egocentric View of Infants and Toddlers with Head-Mounted Cameras

Published on: October 5, 2018

7.1K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental psychology
  • Visual perception
  • Cognitive neuroscience

Background:

  • Perceiving three-dimensional (3D) object structure from two-dimensional (2D) retinal input is crucial for object recognition.
  • Structure-from-motion (SFM) displays utilize the motion of dots on a rotating object's surface to create the perception of 3D shape.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate infants' ability to extract 3D form from SFM displays.
  • To assess if infants can differentiate novel 3D shapes from familiar ones based on motion cues.
  • To validate a neuroimaging-friendly protocol for studying 3D shape perception in infants.

Main Methods:

  • Familiarization/visual-paired-comparison paradigm was employed.
  • Infants (mean age 4.5 and 9 months) were familiarized with a rotating SFM display (e.g., cylinder).
  • Test phase involved presenting the familiar SFM display alongside a novel SFM display (e.g., cube).

Main Results:

  • Infants in both age groups showed a significant preference for the novel SFM display.
  • This preference indicates successful discrimination between familiar and novel 3D shapes.
  • Results align with previous habituation studies, confirming early 3D form extraction from motion.

Conclusions:

  • Infants possess an early-emerging capacity to perceive 3D structure from coherent motion, even without figural cues.
  • The study demonstrates the efficacy of the visual-paired-comparison paradigm for assessing 3D shape perception in infants.
  • The findings support the development of neuroimaging-compatible methods for infant perception research.