Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

5.9K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
5.9K
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

1.0K
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
1.0K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

941
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
941
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.4K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.4K
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

961
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
961

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computational assessment of memory function in kidney transplant recipients and donors.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Cognitive and metacognitive markers of memory retrieval performance in speech prosody.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Feature- and space-based interference with functionally active and passive items in working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Sustained alpha oscillations serve attentional prioritization in working memory, not maintenance.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Attention modulates the effects of stimulus brightness and contrast on time perception.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Trends in testing effect research: from lab to classroom, but not yet for all learners.

NPJ science of learning·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K

Decision making in concurrent multitasking: do people adapt to task interference?

Menno Nijboer1, Niels A Taatgen, Annelies Brands

  • 1Department of Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Plos One
|November 19, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People struggle to adapt their behavior to multitasking demands. Even when optimal task combinations minimize interference, many participants didn't adapt, and others took many trials to learn the best strategy.

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

12.7K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

5.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Multitasking research often focuses on performance, but less is known about behavioral adaptation to multitasking demands.
  • Understanding how individuals adjust their strategies is crucial for optimizing task performance and cognitive load management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether individuals adapt their strategy choices to minimize interference when faced with dual-tasking demands.
  • To determine if people proactively select task combinations that optimize performance and minimize cognitive effort.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using a primary multicolumn subtraction task (requiring working memory) combined with a secondary task (working memory or visual attention).
  • Participants chose their secondary task before each trial, allowing for the analysis of preferential strategy selection.
  • Interference between tasks was measured by performance outcomes, while adaptation was assessed through choice data over trials.

Main Results:

  • Performance data confirmed that optimal task combinations, as predicted, resulted in minimal interference.
  • However, choice data revealed that one-third of participants showed no behavioral adaptation to minimize interference.
  • The remaining participants required a significant number of trials to consistently choose the most efficient task combinations.

Conclusions:

  • While humans possess the capacity to adapt behavior to multitasking demands, this adaptation is not always automatic.
  • The selection of efficient dual-tasking strategies requires conscious effort and learning over time.
  • Findings suggest a gap between the ability to adapt and the consistent, proactive application of adaptive strategies in multitasking scenarios.