Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bone Remodeling01:40

Bone Remodeling

34.4K
Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.
34.4K
Bone Structure01:55

Bone Structure

40.4K
Within the skeletal system, the structure of a bone, or osseous tissue, can be exemplified in a long bone, like the femur, where there are two types of osseous tissue: cortical and cancellous.
40.4K
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling01:31

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

3.9K
Osteoclasts are cells responsible for bone resorption and remodeling. They originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells present in the bone marrow. Numerous progenitor cells fuse to form multinucleated cells, each with 10-20 nuclei. A single osteoclast has a diameter of 150 to 200 µM. These cells have ruffled borders that break down the underlying bone tissue and release minerals such as calcium into the blood in bone resorption. Osteoclasts cling to bones with their ruffled edges during...
3.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Continuous ARterial monitoring in Elderly and Frail patients for hip fractUre surgery to prevent Low blood pressure - the CAREFUL Study Protocol.

Anaesthesia reports·2026
Same author

Predictors for day case surgery in shoulder arthroplasty: a study using the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England.

Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research·2025
Same author

Consensus on long-term follow-up and surveillance of elective primary shoulder arthroplasty using a real-time Delphi technique.

Shoulder & elbow·2025
Same author

Outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a day case procedure: a population-based cohort study using the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2025
Same author

Facilitating the transition from hospital to home after hip fracture surgery: a qualitative study from the HIP HELPER trial.

BMC geriatrics·2024
Same author

TRIGLYCERIDE - GLUCOSE INDEX, REMNANT CHOLESTEROL AND COMMON CAROTID ARTERY INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS AS AN ATHEROSCLEROTIC MARKER IN ISCHEMIC STROKE PATIENTS.

Georgian medical news·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
10:10

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Published on: July 5, 2011

43.4K

Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals.

A P Sprowson1, K S Rankin, I McNamara

  • 1Warwick Medical School, Clinical SciencesBuilding, Warwick University, CliffordBridge Road, Coventry CV2 2DX, UK.

Bone & Joint Research
|November 20, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Understanding the peer review process is crucial for orthopaedic surgeons. Enhancing manuscript quality and transparency in peer review improves publication success and feedback.

Keywords:
BlindingGuidelinesJournalsOrthopaedicsPeer reviewPublication

More Related Videos

Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
07:24

Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Published on: January 23, 2018

9.7K
Orthopedic Robot-Assisted Femoral Neck System in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture
05:42

Orthopedic Robot-Assisted Femoral Neck System in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture

Published on: March 3, 2023

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
10:10

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Published on: July 5, 2011

43.4K
Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
07:24

Autologous Microfractured and Purified Adipose Tissue for Arthroscopic Management of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Published on: January 23, 2018

9.7K
Orthopedic Robot-Assisted Femoral Neck System in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture
05:42

Orthopedic Robot-Assisted Femoral Neck System in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture

Published on: March 3, 2023

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic surgery
  • Scientific publishing
  • Manuscript evaluation

Background:

  • The orthopaedic community requires a clearer understanding of the manuscript peer review process.
  • Current review procedures and feedback mechanisms can be improved.
  • Enhancing publication success is a key goal for researchers in orthopaedics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate the intricacies of the peer review process for orthopaedic manuscripts.
  • To provide actionable strategies for improving manuscript quality.
  • To maximize the success rate of publications within the field.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on scientific peer review.
  • Analysis of common pitfalls in manuscript submission.
  • Development of practical guidelines for authors.

Main Results:

  • Identified key areas for improvement in manuscript preparation.
  • Highlighted the importance of transparency in the peer review system.
  • Provided evidence-based recommendations for authors and reviewers.

Conclusions:

  • A better understanding of peer review and improved manuscript quality will enhance the publication process.
  • Educating orthopaedic surgeons on submission best practices is vital.
  • Increased transparency and quality lead to better scientific publications.