Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

08:21
Non-invasive Assessments of Subjective and Objective Recovery Characteristics Following an Exhaustive Jump Protocol
Published on: June 8, 2017
11.0K
Performance indices selection for assessing anaerobic power during a 30 second vertical jump test
A Theodorou1, G Paradisis, V Panoutsakopoulos
1Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences University of Athens, Athens, Greece - aptheod@phed.uoa.gr.
The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness
|November 20, 2013
Summary
The 30-second Bosco vertical jump test (VJT) is a valid measure of power output compared to the Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT) when jump height is used. Proper unit selection is crucial for assessing short-duration maximal efforts.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Exercise Physiology
- Biomechanics
Background:
- The 30-second Bosco vertical jump test (VJT) is a common field test for assessing lower body power.
- The 30-second Wingate anaerobic test (WAnT) is a gold standard for evaluating anaerobic capacity and power output.
- Assessing the validity of VJT performance indices against WAnT is crucial for accurate performance evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the validity of jump height (h), absolute (VPOWERABS), and relative (VPOWERREL) power indices from a modified 30-second VJT.
- To compare these VJT indices against absolute (WPOWERABS) and relative (WPOWERREL) power values derived from a 30-second WAnT.
Main Methods:
- Nineteen physical education students (age 21 ± 3 years) performed a 30-second VJT on a force plate and a 30-second WAnT on a cycle ergometer.
- Performance data were analyzed for the entire 30-second duration and four 7.5-second intervals.
- Key metrics included jump height (cm), absolute power (W), and power relative to body mass (W·kg⁻¹).
Main Results:
- Absolute power (WPOWERABS) from the WAnT was significantly correlated with jump height (h) across all time intervals of the VJT (r=0.36–0.51).
- Absolute power (VPOWERABS) from the VJT showed a significant correlation with WPOWERABS only in the initial 0–7.5 second interval (r=0.48).
- No significant correlations were found for relative power indices between the two tests.
Conclusions:
- The 30-second VJT is a valid measure against the 30-second WAnT when jump height (h) is used as the primary performance index.
- The choice of measurement unit is critical for accurately assessing effort distribution during short-duration, maximal-effort tests.
- Jump height appears to be a more reliable indicator of anaerobic power compared to calculated power in the VJT when compared to the WAnT.

