Endoscopic vein harvesting: technique, outcomes, concerns & controversies

Shahzad G Raja1, Zubair Sarang

  • 1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Harefield Hospital, London, UK;

Journal of Thoracic Disease
|November 20, 2013
PubMed

Insights

Endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) offers benefits like reduced pain and complications compared to open vein harvesting (OVH). However, concerns about graft patency hinder its widespread adoption.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Graft conduit choice significantly impacts coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) outcomes.
  • Internal mammary artery is preferred for long-term patency, but long saphenous vein (LSV) is widely used for multi-vessel revascularization.
  • Traditional open vein harvesting (OVH) of LSV causes significant wound morbidity and patient dissatisfaction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the technical aspects, outcomes, and controversies of endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) in CABG.
  • To compare EVH with OVH regarding wound complications, patient satisfaction, and graft patency.
  • To address concerns hindering the universal adoption of EVH.

Main Methods:

  • Review of published literature comparing endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) and open vein harvesting (OVH).
  • Analysis of data on wound-related complications, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and patient satisfaction.
  • Evaluation of studies addressing the impact of EVH on vein graft patency and long-term clinical outcomes.

Main Results:

  • Endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) is associated with decreased wound complications, improved patient satisfaction, shorter hospital stays, and reduced postoperative pain compared to open vein harvesting (OVH).
  • Concerns persist regarding potential injury during EVH and its detrimental effect on vein graft patency and clinical outcomes.
  • Published data suggest benefits of EVH, yet its universal adoption is limited by these concerns.

Conclusions:

  • Endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) presents significant advantages over open vein harvesting (OVH) in terms of wound morbidity and patient experience.
  • Further research and standardization are needed to address concerns about graft patency and ensure the safe and effective widespread adoption of EVH in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
  • Balancing the benefits of EVH with potential risks is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes in CABG procedures.