Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function in Experimental Models of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Published on: June 27, 2025
Concordance of measures of left-ventricular hypertrophy in pediatric hypertension
D Mirchandani1, J Bhatia, D Leisman
1Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, North Shore-LIJ Health System, New Hyde Park, NY, USA.
Insights
Pediatric hypertension diagnosis lacks consensus for left-ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH). Echocardiogram findings show poor agreement between wall-thickness z-score and LV mass index (LVMI) criteria, impacting treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Hypertension Management
Background:
- The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends echocardiography for pediatric hypertension to detect left-ventricular hypertrophy (LVH).
- LVH is an indicator for initiating or intensifying antihypertensive therapy in children.
- Current diagnostic methods for pediatric LVH lack consensus, with varying reliance on wall-thickness z-scores versus LV mass index (LVMI).
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the concordance between LVH diagnosis using LV wall-thickness z-scores and LVMI criteria in pediatric hypertension.
- To evaluate agreement between LVH diagnosis by wall-thickness z-score and LVMI(2.7) > 95th percentile.
- To assess agreement between LVH diagnosis by wall-thickness z-score and LVMI(2.7) ≥ 51 g/m(2.7).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of echocardiogram reports for children with hypertension (2009-2012).
- LVH assessment recorded based on three criteria: LV wall-thickness z-score > 2.00, LVMI(2.7) > 95th percentile, and LVMI(2.7) ≥ 51 g/m(2.7).
- Cohen's kappa statistic used to measure agreement between wall-thickness z-score and LVMI(2.7) criteria.
Main Results:
- LVH was diagnosed in 20% by wall-thickness z-score and 47% by LVMI(2.7) > 95th percentile.
- Agreement between wall-thickness z-score and LVMI(2.7) > 95th percentile was 71% (kappa 0.4).
- Agreement between wall-thickness z-score and LVMI(2.7) ≥ 51 g/m(2.7) was 79% (kappa 0.37).
Conclusions:
- There is poor concordance between echocardiogram-based LVH diagnosis using wall-thickness z-scores and LVMI(2.7) criteria in pediatric hypertension.
- Discrepancies in LVH diagnosis can affect antihypertensive therapy decisions.
- Establishing a consensus diagnostic method for pediatric LVH is crucial due to high rates of cardiovascular complications.
Abstract:
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends that any child diagnosed with hypertension have an echocardiogram to evaluate for the presence of left-ventricular (LV) hypertrophy (LVH) and advocates that LVH is an indication to initiate or intensify antihypertensive therapy. However, there is no consensus on the ideal method of defining LVH in the pediatric population. Many pediatric cardiologists rely on wall-thickness z-score of the LV posterior wall and/or interventricular septum to determine LVH. Yet, the AAP advocates using LV mass indexed to 2.7 (LVMI(2.7)) ≥ 51 g/m(2.7) to diagnose LVH. Recently, age-specific reference values for LVMI ≥ 95% were developed. The objective of the study was to determine the concordance between diagnosis of LVH by wall-thickness z-score and diagnosis by LVMI(2.7) criteria. A retrospective chart review was performed for subjects diagnosed with hypertension at a single tertiary care center (2009-2012). Echocardiogram reports were reviewed, and assessment of LVH was recorded. Diagnosis of LVH was assigned to each report reviewed according to three criteria: (1) LV wall-thickness z-score > 2.00; (2) age-specific reference values for LVMI(2.7) > 95th percentile; and (3) LVMI(2.7) > 51 g/m(2.7). Cohen's kappa statistic was used as a measurement of agreement between diagnosis by wall-thickness z-score and diagnosis using LVMI(2.7). A total of 159 echocardiograms in 109 subjects were reviewed. Subjects included 31 females and 77 males, age 13.2 ± 4.4 years, and 39 (42%) with a diagnosis of secondary hypertension. LVH was diagnosed in 31 cases (20%) based on increased wall-thickness z-score. Using LVMI(2.7) > 95%, LVH was found in 75 (47%) cases (mean LVMI(2.7)42.3 ± 17.2 g/m(2.7) [range 11.0-111 g/m(2.7)]). The wall-thickness z-score method agreed with LVMI(2.7) > 95% diagnosis 71% of the time (kappa 0.4). Using LVH criteria of LVMI(2.7) ≥ 51 g/m(2.7), 33 (21%) subjects were diagnosed with LVH. There was 79% agreement in the diagnosis of LVH between the wall-thickness z-score method and LVMI(2.7) > 51 g/m(2.7) (kappa 0.37). There is poor concordance between the diagnosis of LVH on echocardiogram reports using wall-thickness z-score and diagnosis of LVH using LVMI(2.7) criteria. It is important to establish a consensus method for diagnosing LVH because of the high frequency of cardiovascular complications in children with hypertension.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology

