Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

6.3K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
6.3K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

681
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
681
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

6.4K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
6.4K
Critical Values01:31

Critical Values

9.5K
A critical value is a definite value obtained from a particular probability distribution at a predecided confidence level (or a predecided significance level) for a given population parameter. The critical value provides demarcation that separates the sample statistics that are likely to occur from the ones that are unlikely to occur based on the given probability distribution and the population parameter to be estimated. The critical value for normal distribution is obtained from the z...
9.5K
Toxicity Testing in Animals01:23

Toxicity Testing in Animals

222
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
222
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

9.0K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Renal Catheter Ablation in Hypertension.

The American journal of medicine·2024
Same author

Comments on 'The New Threat to Medical Travel for Abortion': Post-Dobbs Abortion Provision.

The American journal of medicine·2024
Same author

Mechanisms of pain and retrograde menstruation in endometriosis.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2024
Same author

Adverse reproductive outcomes in different patterns of adenomyosis.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2023
Same author

Autonomic, Neurovascular Mechanisms in Migraine.

The American journal of medicine·2022
Same author

Physiological approaches to reducing blood loss during cesarean delivery.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Tolerance of Cabbage Butterflies to Urban Pollutants
08:08

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Tolerance of Cabbage Butterflies to Urban Pollutants

Published on: August 18, 2023

5.8K

Safety margins for lead in the general population.

D L Simms1, M J Quinn, J F Thomas

  • 1Dept. of the Environment, Room A3. 28, Romney House, 43 Marsham St., SW1P 3PY, London, UK.

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
|November 21, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Monitoring blood lead concentrations in the UK reveals that few individuals exceed established trigger values for environmental investigation or health checks. Targeted interventions are crucial for those at highest risk due to non-linear exposure-response relationships.

More Related Videos

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

19.7K
Dependence of Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Results on Pulse Energies and Timing Parameters Using Soil Simulants
08:53

Dependence of Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Results on Pulse Energies and Timing Parameters Using Soil Simulants

Published on: September 23, 2013

9.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Tolerance of Cabbage Butterflies to Urban Pollutants
08:08

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Tolerance of Cabbage Butterflies to Urban Pollutants

Published on: August 18, 2023

5.8K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

19.7K
Dependence of Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Results on Pulse Energies and Timing Parameters Using Soil Simulants
08:53

Dependence of Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy Results on Pulse Energies and Timing Parameters Using Soil Simulants

Published on: September 23, 2013

9.8K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Health
  • Toxicology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Blood lead concentration is the primary biological indicator for lead exposure in humans.
  • The UK has established three trigger values for blood lead levels: 25 μg/100 ml for environmental investigation, 35 μg/100 ml for health checks, and 50 μg/100 ml for potential symptoms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate blood lead concentrations against UK trigger values.
  • To assess the proportion of the population exceeding these trigger values.
  • To examine the impact of changes in lead control measures on blood lead levels.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of blood lead concentration monitoring data.
  • Comparison of data against established UK trigger values.
  • Estimation of population proportions exceeding trigger values.
  • Examination of factors influencing blood lead levels and potential effects of regulatory changes.

Main Results:

  • The number or proportion of individuals exceeding the trigger values (25, 35, and 50 μg/100 ml) is relatively small across the total population.
  • Reductions in exposure are expected to yield smaller relative decreases in blood lead for individuals with the highest existing concentrations due to a non-linear relationship.
  • Qualitative changes in blood lead levels are anticipated from reduced lead in petrol, elimination of leaded solder in food cans, and regional differences in water supply lead content.

Conclusions:

  • Current UK blood lead levels suggest a low proportion of the population exceeds established health-based trigger values.
  • Individuals with the highest blood lead levels require individualized identification and intervention due to non-linear exposure-response dynamics.
  • Ongoing and proposed reductions in lead usage are likely to further decrease population blood lead concentrations, with targeted efforts being key for high-risk groups.