Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Creating Radio-cephalic Arteriovenous Fistula in the Forearm with a Modified No-Touch Technique
Published on: April 1, 2022
Should the radial artery be used as a bypass graft following radial access coronary angiography
Lisa M Lim1, Sean D Galvin, Mohamed Javid
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Insights
Radial artery (RA) use for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may be compromised after radial access coronary angiography (RA-CA). Studies show RA-CA can cause structural damage and reduce bypass graft patency, advising against its use post-angiography.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- The radial artery (RA) is a preferred conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after the internal thoracic artery.
- Radial access coronary angiography (RA-CA) is increasingly utilized for cardiac procedures.
- Potential structural and functional damage to the RA from RA-CA may impact its suitability for future CABG.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of prior radial access coronary angiography (RA-CA) on the radial artery's (RA) utility as a bypass conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
- To determine if RA-CA compromises the structural integrity and functional capacity of the RA for subsequent use in CABG.
Main Methods:
- A best evidence topic review was conducted following a structured protocol.
- A comprehensive literature search identified 11 relevant papers from 167 initial findings.
- Data on patient groups, study types, and outcomes related to RA-CA and RA conduit use were tabulated.
Main Results:
- Acute RA occlusion occurs in 2.3-30.5% of patients post-RA-CA, with impaired endothelial function markers even after recanalization.
- RA-CA induces structural injury, including intimal hyperplasia, periarterial inflammation, intimal tears, and medial dissections.
- Graft patency is significantly reduced (77%) in RAs previously used for RA-CA compared to controls (98%).
Conclusions:
- The radial artery should be avoided as a bypass conduit if it has previously undergone radial access coronary angiography.
- If RA conduit use is necessary, it should be delayed for at least 3 months post-RA-CA.
- Preoperative Doppler ultrasound assessment of RA patency and flow is recommended when conduit options are limited.
Abstract:
The radial artery (RA) is often selected as the next conduit of choice following the internal thoracic artery for coronary artery bypass grafting operations (CABG). Radial access coronary angiography (RA-CA) has grown in popularity among cardiologists and has been advocated as the access route of choice for coronary angiography and intervention by many groups. However, sheath insertion and instrumentation may lead to structural and functional damage to the RA, which may preclude its use as a bypass conduit. The increasing use of RA-CA may therefore have an adverse effect on the ability to use the RA as a bypass conduit at subsequent CABG. To review this, a best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: 'should the radial artery be used as a bypass conduit following radial access coronary angiography'? Altogether, 167 papers were found using the reported search; 11 papers were identified that provided the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these studies were tabulated. Acute RA occlusion occurs in 2.3-30.5% of patients undergoing RA-CA. While a significant number of occluded RA's show recanalization on early follow-up, markers of endothelial function such as intima-media thickening (IMT) and flow-mediated dilatation remain impaired. RA-CA causes structural injury to the RA with evidence of histological injury (including intimal hyperplasia, periarterial tissue/fat necrosis and adventitial inflammation) along with intimal tears and medial dissections evident along the entire length of the vessel. Only one paper directly assesses patency rates of RA's used as bypass grafts following RA-CA finding a significant adverse effect on graft patency (77% patency in RA-CA, compared with 98% in the control group). We recommend avoiding the RA as a bypass conduit if it has previously been used for RA-CA. In situations where conduit options are limited, if possible, the RA should be avoided for at least 3 months following RA-CA and it may be beneficial to assess the RA's patency and flow characteristics with Doppler ultrasound preoperatively.
More Related Videos
05:31Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
13:10Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery ALCAPA
Published on: April 24, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Arteries of the Upper Limbs
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Hemodialysis I: Introduction