Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Auricular Point Acupressure Therapy: A Safe and Effective Treatment for Postsurgical Abortion Recovery
Published on: February 3, 2026
ACR appropriateness Criteria® second and third trimester bleeding
Ann E Podrasky1, Marcia C Javitt, Phyllis Glanc
1*Baptist Hospital of Miami/South Miami Center for Women and Infants, Miami, Florida; †Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland; ‡Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Bayview Campus, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; §University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; ∥Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston Massachusetts; ¶Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; #George Washington University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia; **Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; ††Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston Massachusetts; ‡‡Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; §§Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; ∥∥Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Missouri; ¶¶Columbia University, New York, New York, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology; ##Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; ***University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and †††Valley Hospital, Ridgewood, New Jersey, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Vaginal bleeding occurring in the second or third trimesters of pregnancy can variably affect perinatal outcome, depending on whether it is minor (i.e. a single, mild episode) or major (heavy bleeding or multiple episodes.) Ultrasound is used to evaluate these patients. Sonographic findings may range from marginal subchorionic hematoma to placental abruption. Abnormal placentations such as placenta previa, placenta accreta and vasa previa require accurate diagnosis for clinical management. In cases of placenta accreta, magnetic resonance imaging is useful as an adjunct to ultrasound and is often appropriate for evaluation of the extent of placental invasiveness and potential involvement of adjacent structures. MRI is useful for preplanning for cases of complex delivery, which may necessitate a multi-disciplinary approach for optimal care.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every two years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Vaginal bleeding occurring in the second or third trimesters of pregnancy can variably affect perinatal outcome, depending on whether it is minor (i.e. a single, mild episode) or major (heavy bleeding or multiple episodes.) Ultrasound is used to evaluate these patients. Sonographic findings may range from marginal subchorionic hematoma to placental abruption. Abnormal placentations such as placenta previa, placenta accreta and vasa previa require accurate diagnosis for clinical management. In cases of placenta accreta, magnetic resonance imaging is useful as an adjunct to ultrasound and is often appropriate for evaluation of the extent of placental invasiveness and potential involvement of adjacent structures. MRI is useful for preplanning for cases of complex delivery, which may necessitate a multi-disciplinary approach for optimal care.The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every two years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

