Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Protein-protein Interfaces

Protein-protein Interfaces

Many proteins form complexes to carry out their functions, making protein-protein interactions (PPIs) essential for an organism's survival. Most PPIs are stabilized by numerous weak noncovalent chemical forces. The physical shape of the interfaces determines the way two proteins interact. Many globular proteins have closely-matching shapes on their surfaces, which form a large number of weak bonds. Additionally, many PPIs occur between two helices or between a surface cleft and a...

Protein Networks

Protein Networks

An organism can have thousands of different proteins, and these proteins must cooperate to ensure the health of an organism. Proteins bind to other proteins and form complexes to carry out their functions. Many proteins interact with multiple other proteins creating a complex network of protein interactions.
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain. Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...

Protein Organization

Protein Organization

Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Considerations for Regional Anaesthesia in the Prehospital Environment.

Air medical journal·2025

Same author

Anesthetic Management and Considerations During Surgical Dissection of a Schwannoma Causing Severe Cervical Spinal Canal Stenosis and Vertebral Artery Compression.

Cureus·2024

Same author

Effect of MDMA-assisted therapy on mood and anxiety symptoms in advanced-stage cancer (EMMAC): study protocol for a double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Trials·2024

Same author

EEG Complexity Analysis of Brain States, Tasks and ASD Risk.

Advances in neurobiology·2024

Same author

Patients treated for acute headache with intranasal droperidol spend less time in the emergency department: A retrospective observational study.

Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA·2022

Same author

THE PREVALENCE OF INSOMNIA AND SLEEP APNEA IN DISCHARGE ABSTRACT DATA: A CALL TO IMPROVE DATA QUALITY.

Perspectives in health information management·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Automating human intuition for protein design.

Lucas G Nivón¹, Sinisa Bjelic, Chris King

¹Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195.

|November 23, 2013

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Automating protein design refinement improves stability and function. A new benchmark shows a greedy, one-position optimization method best mimics human intuition for sequence changes in designed enzymes and binding proteins.

Keywords:

algorithm benchmark enzyme protein design protein engineering small-molecule binding

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

Area of Science:

Protein Engineering
Computational Biology
Biochemistry

Background:

Human intuition guides modifications of computationally designed protein sequences.
Manual sequence refinement involves reversions and new interactions to enhance protein stability and function.
Automating this process can lead to more systematic evaluation and reduced human effort.

Purpose of the Study:

To create a benchmark for evaluating automated methods in protein sequence refinement.
To assess computational methods for recapitulating human-designed sequence modifications.
To identify optimal automated strategies for improving designed proteins.

Main Methods:

Development of a benchmark dataset of human-guided sequence changes.
Assessment of various computational methods against this benchmark.
Evaluation of a greedy one-position-at-a-time optimization protocol.

Main Results:

The greedy one-position-at-a-time optimization protocol demonstrated superior performance.
This protocol effectively recapitulated human-intuitive sequence modifications.
Computationally intensive metrics like shape complementarity were key to success.

Conclusions:

Automated refinement of designed protein sequences is feasible and effective.
A greedy optimization strategy using specific metrics outperforms other methods.
This approach can significantly enhance the stability and function of designed binding proteins.