Risk-based Process Development of Biosimilars as Part of the Quality by Design Paradigm
Dénes Zalai1, Christian Dietzsch, Christoph Herwig
1Gedeon Richter Plc., Department of Biotechnology, Budapest, Hungary;
Abstract:
In the last few years, several quality by design (QbD) studies demonstrated the benefit of systematic approaches for biopharmaceutical development. However, only very few studies identified biosimilars as a special case of product development. The targeted quality profile of biosimilars is strictly defined by the originator's product characteristic. Moreover, the major source of prior knowledge is the experience with the originator product itself. Processing this information in biosimilar development has a major effect on risk management and process development strategies. The main objective of this contribution is to demonstrate how risk management can facilitate the implementation of QbD in early-stage product development with special emphasis on fitting the reported approaches to biosimilars. Risk assessments were highlighted as important tools to integrate prior knowledge in biosimilar development. The risk assessment process as suggested by the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH Q9) was reviewed and three elements were identified to play a key role in targeted risk assessment approaches: proper understanding of target linkage, risk assessment tool compliance, and criticality threshold value. Adjusting these steps to biosimilar applications helped to address some unique challenges of these products such as a strictly defined quality profile or a lack of process knowledge. This contribution demonstrates the need for tailored risk management approaches for the risk-based development of biosimilars and provides novel tools for the integration of additional knowledge available for these products.
Lay Abstract:
The pharmaceutical industry is facing challenges such as profit loss and price competition. Companies are forced to rationalize business models and to cut costs in development as well as manufacturing. These trends recently hinder the implementation of any concepts that do not offer certain financial benefit or promise a long return of investment. Quality by design (QbD) is a concept that is currently struggling for more acceptance from the side of the pharmaceutical industry. To achieve this, the major goals of QbD have to be revisited and QbD tools have to be subsequently developed. This contribution offers an example as to how implement risk management in early-stage biosimilar development as part of the QbD concept. The main goal was to go beyond the conventional QbD workflow and to adjust risk management to the challenges of biosimilar products. Accordingly, instead of using methods like failure mode and effects analysis, recommendations of the ICH Q9 guideline were reviewed and put into practice by creating tailored risk assessment tools. The novelty of this contribution is to report those tailored tools ready-to-use for early bioprocess development of biosimilars along QbD principles.
More Related Videos
05:45Author Spotlight: Process Development for the Spray-Drying of Probiotic Bacteria and Evaluation of the Product Quality
Published on: April 7, 2023
08:58Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
Published on: October 17, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Biopharmaceutical Factors Influencing Drug Product Design: Overview
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
Preclinical Development: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
