Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Time dependency of outcomes for drug-eluting vs bare-metal stents
Alexander A Leung1, Danielle A Southern, P Diane Galbraith
1Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Insights
First-generation drug-eluting stents showed early benefits in reducing death or repeat procedures. However, these advantages faded over time, with similar long-term outcomes compared to bare-metal stents after eight years.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- First-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) were developed to improve outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- Previous studies suggested an initial benefit of DES over bare-metal stents (BMS).
- The long-term efficacy and durability of early DES compared to BMS require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the long-term comparative effectiveness of first-generation DES versus BMS.
- To assess the time-varying risk of death and repeat revascularization after PCI.
- To determine if the early benefits of DES persist over an 8-year follow-up period.
Main Methods:
- Extended analysis of a cohort of 6440 patients undergoing PCI between 2003 and 2005.
- Comparison of outcomes (death, death or repeat revascularization) between patients receiving DES (sirolimus, paclitaxel) and BMS.
- Utilized Cox proportional hazards modeling with spline analysis to determine time-dependent, risk-adjusted hazard ratios.
Main Results:
- Drug-eluting stents demonstrated significantly better outcomes within the first year post-implantation.
- At 30 days, adjusted hazard ratios for death and death/repeat revascularization were 0.38 and 0.27, respectively.
- By 8 years, no significant benefit of DES over BMS was observed; adjusted hazard ratios for death and death/repeat revascularization were 1.15 and 1.01, respectively.
Conclusions:
- First-generation DES provide an early survival and procedural benefit compared to BMS.
- This early advantage diminishes over time, with no significant difference in long-term outcomes up to 8 years.
- The findings suggest that the long-term risk profile of early DES is comparable to BMS.
Background:
Previous research suggests that the early benefit from revascularization with drug-eluting stents might diminish over time.
Methods:
We performed an extended analysis of a previously identified cohort of 6440 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention between April 1, 2003 and March 31, 2005 using a prospective provincial clinical registry in Alberta, Canada. We compared rates of death, and of death or repeat revascularization among the 6440 patients receiving either drug-eluting (sirolimus- and paclitaxel) stents or bare-metal stents. We determined risk-adjusted hazard ratios at moments in time with a spline analysis using Cox proportional hazards modelling.
Results:
During the 8 years of observation, the relative risks for death or the composite outcome of death or repeat revascularization varied over time. There was an early finding of better outcomes associated with drug-eluting stents in the first year after implantation. Thereafter, there was no significant benefit associated with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents with 8 years of follow-up. At 30 days, the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.81) for death and 0.27 (95% CI, 0.14-0.54) for the composite outcome of death or repeat revascularization. By 8 years, the adjusted hazard ratio of death or the composite outcome was 1.15 (95% CI, 0.97-1.36) and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.87-1.17), respectively.
Conclusions:
Revascularization with first-generation drug-eluting stents is associated with better outcomes within the first year only. Thereafter, the risk of death or repeat revascularization is similar between drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents.
Related Concept Videos
Time Course of Drug Effect
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Duration of Dose-Effect Relationship
Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Influencing Factors
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Influence of Elimination Half-Life on Effect Duration

