Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

12.2K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
12.2K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

216
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
216
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

3.7K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
3.7K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.7K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.7K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

2.2K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
2.2K
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

576
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
576

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remarkably reproducible psychological (memory) phenomena in the classroom: some evidence for generality from small-N research.

BMC psychology·2022
Same author

Historically recontextualizing Sidman's Tactics: How behavior analysis avoided psychology's methodological Ouroboros.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2020
Same author

The therapeutic effect of stiripentol in Gabrg2<sup>+/Q390X</sup> mice associated with epileptic encephalopathy.

Epilepsy research·2019
Same author

Altered glutamate clearance in ascorbate deficient mice increases seizure susceptibility and contributes to cognitive impairment in APP/PSEN1 mice.

Neurobiology of aging·2018
Same author

Heat induced temperature dysregulation and seizures in Dravet Syndrome/GEFS+ Gabrg2<sup>+/Q390X</sup> mice.

Epilepsy research·2017
Same author

Differential molecular and behavioural alterations in mouse models of GABRG2 haploinsufficiency versus dominant negative mutations associated with human epilepsy.

Human molecular genetics·2016
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 19, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.7K

Test order effects in simultaneous protocols.

Abdulrazaq A Imam1, Timothy A Warner

  • 1John Carroll University, University Heights, OH, USA, aimam@jcu.edu.

Learning & Behavior
|November 26, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A hybrid protocol improved stimulus equivalence outcomes compared to the standard simultaneous protocol in behavioral research. This suggests that the testing order in equivalence research significantly impacts participant accuracy and results.

More Related Videos

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.0K
A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
07:02

A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development

Published on: February 11, 2019

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 19, 2025

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.7K
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

5.0K
A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
07:02

A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development

Published on: February 11, 2019

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Psychology
  • Learning Theory
  • Stimulus Equivalence

Background:

  • Simultaneous protocols in equivalence research often result in suboptimal outcomes.
  • Understanding factors influencing stimulus equivalence is crucial for advancing learning theory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of a standard simultaneous protocol versus a hybrid protocol for stimulus equivalence.
  • To investigate the impact of testing order on equivalence outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Conditional discrimination procedures were used with two groups and three 3-member equivalence sets.
  • Two conditions were employed: standard simultaneous protocol and a hybrid protocol (simultaneous training, simple-to-complex testing).
  • Experiments varied in whether conditions were completed in one session or separate sessions.

Main Results:

  • The hybrid protocol demonstrated superior accuracy compared to the standard simultaneous protocol across both experiments.
  • Equivalence yield was consistently higher under the hybrid protocol than the standard protocol.
  • Results were consistent regardless of whether conditions were tested in a single session or separate sessions.

Conclusions:

  • A hybrid protocol, incorporating a specific testing order, enhances stimulus equivalence outcomes.
  • The order of testing for emergent relations may explain the challenges associated with the standard simultaneous protocol.
  • Findings offer practical implications for designing more effective equivalence-based learning protocols.