Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Biosensor for Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus Bacteria
Published on: May 8, 2013
Detecting methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of different phenotypic methods and the
1Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Medical Sciences, Salman Bin AbdulAziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia. drshamweel@hotmail.com
Abstract:
Cefoxitin is a more potent inducer of the mecA regulatory system compared to oxacillin in Staphylococcus aureus. It has been recommended for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) when using disk-diffusion testing. The aim of this study is to compare the results of cefoxitin and oxacillin disk-diffusion methods against the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of MRSA. A total of 75 strains of S. aureus isolated from different clinical specimens (e.g., pus, blood, wound swabs, tracheal aspirates, eye swabs and cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) were screened for methicillin resistance by PCR and cefoxitin and oxacillin disk-diffusion tests. The antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the Baur disk-diffusion method using oxacillin (1 microg) and cefoxitin (30 microg) disks on Mueller Hinton agar (MHA), and zone diameters as recommended by CLSIs were read at 18 h and 24 h. All MRSA isolates detected phenotypically were confirmed by PCR for the amplification of mecA and nucA genes. Of the 75 isolates screened, 27 were resistant to oxacillin, 30 were resistant to cefoxitin using the disk-diffusion method, while 30 isolates were confirmed as MRSA by PCR. Performing the cefoxitin disk-diffusion method using a 30 microg disk could be a reliable and more accurate method to detect methicillin resistance in S. aureus strains in situations where mecA PCR cannot be performed.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Methods of Classification and Identification
Modern Molecular Taxonomy

