Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Anomalous Sentences Repetition Test: replication and validation study.

D J Weeks

    Journal of Clinical Psychology
    |July 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The virtues of scientific psychology: A reply to Harzem.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Ontological and ideological commitments in behavior analysis.

    The Behavior analyst·2012
    Same author

    Monocular and binocular vision in one-hand ball catching: interocular integration.

    Journal of motor behavior·2009
    Same author

    Influence of terminal action requirements on action-centered distractor effects.

    Experimental brain research·2003
    Same author

    Influence of operator orientation on relative organizational mapping and spatial compatibility.

    Ergonomics·2001
    Same author

    Monocular and binocular vision in the control of goal-directed movement.

    Journal of motor behavior·2000
    Same journal

    Profiles of Early Life Stress and Their Interaction With Proximal Stress in Early Adulthood: A Person-Centered Approach.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Single Versus Multiple Intimate Partner Violence Relationships: Current Severity of Psychological Distress Among Romantic Partners.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Psychological Distress Profiles in Women With Recurrent Pregnancy Loss During Subsequent Early Pregnancy and Their Association With Sleep Characteristics: A Latent Profile Analysis.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Personality Traits in Borderline Personality Disorder: A Cluster Analysis Based on the Millon Test Scores.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Exploring Reasoning Biases Associated With Psychosis in Borderline Personality Disorder Using Self-Report and Objective Measures.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    Same journal

    Maladaptive Perfectionism and Adolescent Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: A Longitudinal Moderated Mediation Model of Hopelessness and Self-Concept Clarity.

    Journal of clinical psychology·2026
    See all related articles

    A new brief clinical test demonstrates reliability and validity. It correlates with brain imaging and other cognitive tests, showing its effectiveness in assessing cognitive function.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuropsychology
    • Clinical Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Cognitive assessment tools are crucial for diagnosing neurological conditions.
    • Existing neuropsychological instruments can be lengthy and time-consuming.
    • There is a need for brief, reliable, and valid cognitive screening tools.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce and validate a new brief clinical test for cognitive assessment.
    • To establish the reliability and interscorer agreement of the new test.
    • To determine the validity of the new test through correlations with established measures.

    Main Methods:

    • Development of a brief clinical test from existing neuropsychological instruments.
    • Assessment of test-retest reliability and interscorer agreement.
    • Correlational analyses with computed tomography (CT) scan measures (cortical atrophy, ventricular enlargement).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Correlational analyses with seven other validated cognitive tests.

    • Main Results:

    • The brief clinical test demonstrated good reliability and interscorer agreement.
    • Significant correlations were found between the new test and CT scan measures of brain atrophy.
    • The test also showed significant correlations with established cognitive tests, supporting its validity.

    Conclusions:

    • The new brief clinical test is a reliable and valid measure for cognitive assessment.
    • This tool offers a time-efficient alternative for evaluating cognitive function in clinical settings.
    • Its correlation with neuroimaging and other cognitive tests supports its utility in research and practice.