Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

07:13
Author Spotlight: Advancing Neonatal Cardiac Diagnostics with Echocardiography-Derived Blood Speckle Imaging
Published on: December 22, 2023
2.0K
Assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction based on the intraventricular velocity difference by vector flow
Ming Chen1, Jia-mei Jin, Yuhui Zhang
1Division of Noninvasive Cardiac Function, Heart Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, 150 Jimo Rd, Pu Dong, 200120 Shanghai, China. mingchen1283@vip.163.com.
Summary
Vector flow mapping quantifies the diastolic intraventricular velocity difference, revealing impaired left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in heart failure and hypertension patients. This method offers a practical tool for assessing LV diastolic function.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Physiology
Background:
- Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function is crucial for cardiac health.
- Assessing LV diastolic function traditionally involves complex measurements.
- Vector flow mapping (VFM) offers a novel approach to visualize and quantify intraventricular blood flow dynamics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the diastolic intraventricular velocity difference (DIVD) in patients with impaired LV diastolic function using VFM.
- To compare DIVD in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and hypertension-induced diastolic dysfunction against healthy controls.
- To explore the correlation of DIVD with established echocardiographic parameters of diastolic function.
Main Methods:
- Patients with LV diastolic dysfunction were categorized into two groups: CHF with restricted filling (n=27) and hypertension with abnormal relaxation (n=34).
- A control group of healthy participants (n=22) was included.
- VFM technology was employed to analyze left ventricular inflow color Doppler findings, measuring flow velocity rates at the LV base and apex to calculate DIVD.
Main Results:
- The DIVD was significantly lower in both patient groups (40.35 ± 6.80 cm/s and 48.50 ± 6.03 cm/s) compared to controls (79.95 ± 9.88 cm/s) (P < .001).
- DIVD showed significant associations with ejection fraction (P = .0002) and deceleration time (P = .0306).
- Peak atrial contraction velocity was negatively correlated with DIVD (P = .0003).
Conclusions:
- The DIVD, calculated using VFM, can serve as a quantitative measure for assessing LV diastolic function.
- VFM technology demonstrates clinical utility in identifying and reflecting LV diastolic dysfunction in pathological conditions.
- This approach provides a practical method for evaluating diastolic intraventricular velocity differences.

