Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Comprehensive & Cost Effective Laboratory Monitoring of HIV/AIDS: an African Role Model
Published on: October 31, 2010
Test result management in global health settings
Daniel Palazuelos1, Jonathan D Payne, Anuj K Dalal
1Daniel Palazuelos, MD, MPH, is an associate physician on the BWH Hospitalist Service, Division of General Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital; an assistant program director for the Global Health Equity (GHE) Residency in the Division of GHE, Brigham and Women's Hospital; the director of the Community Health Worker Quality Improvement Task Force at Partners in Health; and an instructor at Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Many patients experience delayed diagnoses and treatments because test results are poorly managed across diverse healthcare systems. Improving test result follow-up is crucial for timely medical intervention and better patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Clinical Management
- Patient Outcomes
Background:
- Healthcare systems globally exhibit varied approaches to managing patient test results.
- A common outcome is the failure to adequately follow up on clinically significant test results, leading to adverse patient events.
- Both paper-based and electronic medical record (EMR) systems present challenges in ensuring timely access and action on test results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To highlight the critical issue of missed or delayed follow-up on patient test results.
- To examine the systemic failures in test result management across different healthcare settings.
- To underscore the need for improved systems to prevent adverse patient outcomes due to unaddressed test results.
Main Methods:
- The study reviews common challenges in test result management across various healthcare delivery models.
- It analyzes the limitations of both paper-based records and current electronic medical record (EMR) systems in facilitating result follow-up.
- A case vignette of an HIV diagnosis in three distinct settings illustrates the problem.
Main Results:
- Clinically significant test results frequently "fall through the cracks" regardless of the healthcare system.
- Resource-poor settings often isolate results in paper charts, burdening patients with retrieval.
- Even advanced electronic medical records (EMRs) can present static data, hindering easy access and sharing of critical test results.
Conclusions:
- Current methods of managing patient test results are inadequate, leading to significant patient harm.
- Electronic medical records (EMRs) alone have not solved the problem of test result follow-up.
- Systemic improvements are necessary to ensure timely and effective management of all patient test results.
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...

