Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

How to Stabilize Protein: Stability Screens for Thermal Shift Assays and Nano Differential Scanning Fluorimetry in the Virus-X Project
Published on: February 11, 2019
Insights on activity and stability of subtilisin E towards guanidinium chloride and sodium dodecylsulfate
Zhenwei Li1, Danilo Roccatano2, Michael Lorenz3
1RWTH Aachen University, Worringerweg 1, D-52074 Aachen, Germany; School of Engineering and Science, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany.
Abstract:
A subtilisin E variant (M4) showing high activity and resistance towards guanidinium chloride (GdmCl) and sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) was previously identified after three rounds of directed evolution [Li et al., ChemBioChem 2012, 13(5), 691-699.]. In this report, 10 additional positions, identified during directed subtilisin E evolution, were saturated on the previously reported SeSaM1-5 variant (S62/A153/G166/I205). Screening confirmed that chaotolerant variants included amino acid substitutions either in the active site, or the substrate binding pocket. Two variants, M5 (S62I/A153V/G166S/T224A/T240S) and M6 (S62I/A153V/G166S/I205V/N218S/T224A) were finally generated to maximize activity and stability in the presence of GdmCl or SDS. The inactivation concentration (IC50) of M6 using Suc-AAPF-pNA as substrate was significantly increased compared to M4 in the presence of GdmCl (IC50 (M4): 2.7M; IC50 (M6): 4.6M) and SDS (IC50 (M4): 1.5%; IC50 (M6): 4.0%). The half-life in 5M GdmCl was also significantly improved for M6 compared to M4 (t 1/2 (M4): 2min; t 1/2 (M6): 15min). M5 retained resistance towards GdmCl or SDS as in M4. The activity of M5 towards a complex protein substrate (Azocasein) was increased by ∼1.5 fold compared to M4 and M6. Circular dichroism (CD) analysis for subtilisin E wild type (WT) and three variants (M4, M5 and M6) indicated that secondary structures of all variants including wild type at 1-2M GdmCl (except M4) were not significantly perturbed, with unfolding occurring for WT and all three variants above 3M GdmCl. In SDS, the secondary structures of WT and all three variants remained intact at concentrations of 0.5 to 2.0% (w/v) SDS. Results suggest that subtilisin E inactivation occurred most likely due to inhibitory effect, since a general unfolding of the enzyme was not observed through circular dichroism. Such inhibition could be avoided by limiting the access of GdmCl and SDS to the active site and/or to residues involved in substrate binding.
More Related Videos
09:57A Facile and Efficient Approach for the Production of Reversible Disulfide Cross-linked Micelles
Published on: December 23, 2016
09:49Sedimentation Equilibrium of a Small Oligomer-forming Membrane Protein: Effect of Histidine Protonation on Pentameric Stability
Published on: April 2, 2015