Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

09:05
Measurements of CO2 Fluxes at Non-Ideal Eddy Covariance Sites
Published on: June 24, 2019
7.6K
Using Bayesian optimization method and FLEXPART tracer model to evaluate CO emission in East China in springtime.
1Research Institute for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka, Japan, xlpanelf@jamstec.go.jp.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research International
|November 30, 2013
Summary
This study evaluated carbon monoxide (CO) emissions in East China using Bayesian inversion. Results suggest a 37% underestimation by prior data, proposing a correction factor for spring CO emissions.
Area of Science:
- Atmospheric Chemistry
- Environmental Science
- Geophysics
Background:
- Carbon monoxide (CO) is a key pollutant from incomplete combustion, impacting air quality.
- Accurate CO emission data is crucial for understanding and mitigating air pollution in East China.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate CO emission fluxes in East China during springtime.
- To assess the accuracy of existing CO emission inventories using an analytical Bayesian inverse method.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the analytical Bayesian inverse method combined with atmospheric observations at Mount Hua.
- Employed the Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Model (FLEXPART) to simulate source-receptor relationships (SRR).
- Assessed inversion solution stability through repeated random sampling simulations.
Main Results:
- Identified significant discrepancies in CO emission fluxes for the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Yangtze River Delta regions.
- Indicated that prior emission estimates (INTEX-B) may underestimate CO flux by 37%.
- Suggested a correction factor of 1.26 for spring CO emissions in China, aligning with REAS2.0 inventory.
Conclusions:
- The Bayesian inversion method provides a valuable tool for refining CO emission estimates in East China.
- A correction factor of 1.26 is recommended for spring CO emissions, highlighting potential underestimation in current inventories.
- Further research is needed to address uncertainties in both inversion and bottom-up approaches for CO emission assessment.
