Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Adjuvant antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators
T Jared Bunch1, Jeffrey L Anderson
1Intermountain Heart Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, Eccles Outpatient Care Center, 5169 Cottonwood St, Suite 510, Murray, UT, 84107, USA, Thomas.bunch@imail.org.
Insights
Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reduce sudden cardiac death risk. However, ICD shocks negatively impact quality of life; this review explores drug therapies to minimize these shocks in patients with cardiomyopathy.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are crucial for preventing sudden cardiac death in patients with cardiomyopathy and structural heart disease.
- Despite their benefits, patients often experience appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapies, particularly shocks, which detrimentally affect quality of life and prognosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current knowledge on adjuvant antiarrhythmic drug therapy for reducing ICD shocks in patients with cardiomyopathy.
- To discuss non-antiarrhythmic drug strategies, used alone or with antiarrhythmic drugs, to mitigate the risk of subsequent ICD shocks.
Main Methods:
- Literature review focusing on antiarrhythmic and non-antiarrhythmic drug therapies in the context of ICD implantation.
- Synthesis of evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for secondary prevention of ICD therapies.
Main Results:
- Beta-blockers and antiarrhythmic drugs are established for secondary prevention of ICD therapies, though not indicated for primary prevention.
- Adjuvant drug strategies, including non-antiarrhythmic agents, show potential in reducing the frequency of ICD shocks.
Conclusions:
- Optimizing medical therapy is essential for managing patients with ICDs and reducing the burden of shocks.
- Further research into combined pharmacological approaches may improve patient outcomes and quality of life by minimizing unnecessary ICD therapies.
Abstract:
The risk of sudden cardiac death from ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia in patients with cardiomyopathy related to structural heart disease has been favorably impacted by the wide adaptation of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for both primary and secondary prevention. Unfortunately, after ICD implantation both appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapies are common. ICD shocks in particular can have significant effects on quality of life and disease-related morbidity and mortality. While not indicated for primary prevention of ICD therapies, beta-blockers and antiarrhythmic drugs are a cornerstone for secondary prevention of them. This review will summarize our current understanding of adjuvant antiarrhythmic drug therapy in ICD patients. The review will also discuss the roles of nonantiarrhythmic drug approaches that are used in isolation and in combination with antiarrhythmic drugs to reduce subsequent risk of ICD shocks.
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class III Agents as Potassium Channel Blockers
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...

