Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

430
Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
430
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

379
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
379
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

77.8K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
77.8K
Compensation Mechanisms01:28

Compensation Mechanisms

2.0K
The human body employs intricate mechanisms to counteract changes in blood pH, preventing conditions like acidosis (pH < 7.35) and alkalosis (pH > 7.45). These compensatory responses aim to restore normal arterial blood pH by engaging respiratory or renal systems, depending on the source of the imbalance.
Respiratory Compensation
This mechanism addresses metabolic-induced pH imbalances by adjusting breathing rates. Respiratory compensation begins within minutes of detecting a pH...
2.0K
Bias01:22

Bias

6.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
6.2K
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

856
The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
856

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

"You didn't take my side!": When children expect others to be more upset at friends.

Developmental psychology·2026
Same author

Evaluation of Urine Nephrin:Creatine Ratio Longitudinally in Pregnancy for the Detection of Preeclampsia and Kidney Damage in Women With Pre-Existing Diabetes.

The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research·2026
Same author

"Um…" Thinking out loud: Children infer the social meaning of speech disfluencies.

Child development·2026
Same author

The Relationship Between Identity-Based Social Support, Victimization, and Mental Health among LGBTQ+ Youth.

Psychology of sexual orientation and gender diversity·2026
Same author

Calibrated deference: Children's evaluations of responses to disagreement across knowledge gaps.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Good person, but bad friend: Children's developing evaluations of tattling.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

26.2K

Fairness as partiality aversion: the development of procedural justice.

Alex Shaw1, Kristina Olson1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
|December 3, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Children increasingly value procedural justice as they age. Even young children prefer fair procedures over equal outcomes, prioritizing impartiality in resource distribution.

Keywords:
Distributive justiceFairnessImpartialityInequity aversionProcedural justiceSocial Cognitive Development

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

26.2K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.4K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.5K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Justice

Background:

  • Adults accept inequity if procedures are impartial, suggesting a value for procedural justice.
  • It remains unclear if children also prioritize procedural justice over equal outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if 5- to 8-year-old children value procedural justice when distributing resources.
  • To determine if children will create inequity using impartial procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Children aged 5-8 years participated in experiments involving resource distribution.
  • Procedures included impartial (equal chance) and partial (unequal chance) methods.
  • Choices were made between impartial procedures, partial procedures, and discarding resources.

Main Results:

  • Children preferred impartial procedures over partial ones, even if it meant creating inequity.
  • Children chose to discard resources rather than use partial procedures to ensure equality.
  • Older children exhibited a stronger aversion to partial procedures than younger children.

Conclusions:

  • Children increasingly value procedural justice during middle childhood.
  • Fairness concerns in children may focus more on avoiding partiality than inequity itself.