Variability in carotid endarterectomy at a single medical center: an outcome and cost analysis

Sibu P Saha1, Peter M Rodgers-Fischl, David J Minion

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Insights

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) techniques vary widely. This study found no significant differences in cost or short-term outcomes between shunt and no-shunt procedures, despite variations in utilization.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Neurosurgery
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a proven stroke prevention surgery.
  • Significant variability exists in CEA surgical techniques.
  • Understanding technique variability impacts cost and patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze technique variability in carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
  • To assess the impact of shunt utilization on cost and short-term outcomes.
  • To identify surgeon-specific variations in CEA procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective chart review of 349 patients undergoing 374 CEAs.
  • Analysis of shunt and patch utilization across surgeons.
  • Comparison of operative time, length of stay, cost, and in-hospital mortality between shunt and no-shunt groups.

Main Results:

  • Shunt utilization varied significantly by surgeon (3% to 94%).
  • Shunt placement increased operative time by ~1.4 hours and length of stay by 1.7 days.
  • No significant difference in procedure cost or in-hospital mortality between shunt and no-shunt groups.

Conclusions:

  • CEA technique variability, particularly shunt use, does not significantly impact short-term outcomes or cost.
  • Standardization of CEA techniques may not be necessary based on cost and short-term outcomes.
  • Further research could explore long-term outcomes and patient-specific factors influencing technique choice.

Related Concept Videos