Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

19.4K

Evaluation of calling algorithms for array-CGH.

Siddharth Roy1, Alison Motsinger Reif

  • 1Department of Statistics, College of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC, USA.

Frontiers in Genetics
|December 4, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Semi-targeted Metabolomics Analysis of Biomarkers of Low to Moderate Alcohol Intake in the Postmenopausal Women's Alcohol Study: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Feeding Study.

The Journal of nutrition·2026
Same author

Hypoxia-induced metastatic heterogeneity in pancreatic cancer.

Research square·2025
Same author

Knowledge that HPV can cause oropharyngeal cancer and cervical cancer among adults in the United States: A comparison of prevalence and predictors.

Public health·2025
Same author

DYNAMIC RISK PREDICTION FOR CERVICAL PRECANCER SCREENING WITH CONTINUOUS AND BINARY LONGITUDINAL BIOMARKERS.

The annals of applied statistics·2025
Same author

Mapping of genotype-by-environment interaction loci for Metabolic Syndrome-like traits using the multi-parent <i>Drosophila</i> Synthetic Population Resource determines that main genetic effects are distinct from environment dependent plastic loci.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Suboptimal Quality of Health Care and Associated Socioeconomic Factors Among Cancer Survivors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing·2025
Same journal

Novel variants in LSS related hypotrichosis simplex 14.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Network-based analysis identifies shared mechanisms between ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction and therapeutic ingredients of Buyang Huanwu Decoction.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

GWAS analysis of a depression cohort defined by an EHR-phenotyping algorithm reveals the role of immune regulations in depression risk.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Ferroptosis, lipid metabolism, and genetic regulation in postoperative rehabilitation of elderly hip fractures: from molecular mechanisms to clinical translation.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Single-cell and pseudobulk analyses reveal hidden mitochondrial expression imbalance in gastric cancer.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
Same journal

Transcriptomic profiling and experimental validation of myeloid-cell-differentiation-related key genes in osteoarthritis.

Frontiers in genetics·2026
See all related articles

New statistical methods improve copy number variation (CNV) detection accuracy on comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) arrays. These local statistics offer better reproducibility than current global methods, addressing discrepancies in genetic studies.

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Copy number variation (CNV) detection is crucial for genetic studies and disease research.
  • Discrepancies exist in genome-wide CNV profiles across different technologies and even within the same technology.
  • Change point algorithms for CNV calling exhibit significant disagreement on identical datasets.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate novel local statistical methods for CNV detection and calling on comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) arrays.
  • To compare the performance of these new local methods against existing global methods.
  • To provide insights into the lack of reproducibility in CNV detection and guide method selection.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) arrays for their suitability to statistical modeling.
Keywords:
array CGHchange point modelcopy number variationmethods comparisonscan statistics

More Related Videos

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
16:37

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Published on: August 5, 2008

12.5K
Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries
11:59

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

19.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants
09:16

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Array CGH for Detection of Genomic Copy Number Variants

Published on: February 21, 2015

19.4K
Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization
16:37

Technical Demonstration of Whole Genome Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

Published on: August 5, 2008

12.5K
Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries
11:59

Competitive Genomic Screens of Barcoded Yeast Libraries

Published on: August 11, 2011

19.4K
  • Describe recent methodological developments in local statistics applied to CNV detection.
  • Utilize simulation studies and public datasets for comparative analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • New local statistical methods demonstrate improved accuracy and consistency for CNV detection on CGH arrays.
    • Comparison reveals significant differences in performance between local and global methods.
    • Results highlight the impact of algorithmic choices on CNV profile reproducibility.

    Conclusions:

    • Local statistical approaches offer a more robust and reproducible framework for CNV detection on CGH arrays.
    • Understanding methodological differences is key to addressing reproducibility issues in genomic studies.
    • The findings provide practical guidance for selecting appropriate CNV detection methods.