Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Glaucoma: Overview01:25

Glaucoma: Overview

1.7K
Glaucoma is an eye condition characterized by increased intraocular pressure that damages the retina and optic nerve, leading to irreversible blindness if left untreated. The human eye has various components, including the cornea, iris, pupil, lens, and optic nerve. Aqueous humor is secreted by the epithelium of the ciliary body in the posterior chamber and flows through the trabecular meshwork and canal of Schlemm, maintaining normal intraocular pressure. The trabecular meshwork and the canal...
1.7K
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment01:27

Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment

1.1K
In open-angle glaucoma, the iridocorneal angle remains open, but the trabecular meshwork becomes stiff, slowing down the outflow of aqueous humor. This causes a buildup of aqueous humor in the anterior chamber, leading to a sudden increase in intraocular pressure. The treatment for open-angle glaucoma focuses on reducing the elevated intraocular pressure by either decreasing the secretion of aqueous humor or increasing its outflow.
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
1.1K
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment01:28

Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment

1.6K
Angle-closure glaucoma, or closed-angle glaucoma, is an eye condition where the iris bulges out and blocks the iridocorneal angle, resulting in a buildup of aqueous humor and increased intraocular pressure. Immediate medical attention is necessary due to the sudden onset of symptoms. The treatment for angle-closure glaucoma includes short-term and long-term approaches. Short-term treatment involves using eye drops like pilocarpine to lower intraocular pressure by increasing aqueous humor...
1.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genomic Profiling of Intraocular Leiomyomas Reveals Recurrent Copy Number Alterations.

Translational vision science & technology·2025
Same author

Penetrating Keratoplasty in Congenital Glaucoma.

Journal of clinical medicine·2023
Same author

Diffuse Corneal Edema after Uneventful Pterygium Surgery: Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome or Toxic Keratopathy?

Turkish journal of ophthalmology·2022
Same author

Corneal Endothelial Changes in Patients With Primary Congenital Glaucoma.

Journal of glaucoma·2021
Same author

Evaluation of the Cataract Surgery 2018 Survey in Terms of Achieving Refractive Cataract Surgery Targets.

Turkish journal of ophthalmology·2021
Same author

Association of Rare CYP39A1 Variants With Exfoliation Syndrome Involving the Anterior Chamber of the Eye.

JAMA·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

7.7K

Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.

Ahmet Ozkok1, Nevbahar Tamcelik, Akif Ozdamar

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Cerrahpasa School of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Journal of Glaucoma
|December 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Patients with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEXG) exhibit lower corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) compared to those with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Further research is needed to understand the implications of these biomechanical differences.

More Related Videos

Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents
10:10

Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents

Published on: February 15, 2022

1.7K
Trabecular Meshwork Response to Pressure Elevation in the Living Human Eye
09:03

Trabecular Meshwork Response to Pressure Elevation in the Living Human Eye

Published on: June 20, 2015

8.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential
07:11

Assessing Early Stage Open-Angle Glaucoma in Patients by Isolated-Check Visual Evoked Potential

Published on: May 25, 2020

7.7K
Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents
10:10

Full-Circle Cauterization of Limbal Vascular Plexus for Surgically Induced Glaucoma in Rodents

Published on: February 15, 2022

1.7K
Trabecular Meshwork Response to Pressure Elevation in the Living Human Eye
09:03

Trabecular Meshwork Response to Pressure Elevation in the Living Human Eye

Published on: June 20, 2015

8.7K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomechanical Engineering
  • Glaucoma Research

Background:

  • Pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEXG) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) are leading causes of irreversible blindness.
  • Corneal biomechanical properties play a crucial role in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement and glaucoma progression.
  • Understanding differences in corneal biomechanics between PEXG and POAG is essential for accurate diagnosis and management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess and compare the biomechanical properties of corneas in patients with PEXG versus POAG.
  • To investigate differences in corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) between the two glaucoma types.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective, comparative case series involving 73 eyes from 73 patients (35 with PEXG, 38 with POAG).
  • Corneal biomechanical parameters including CH, corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPCC), and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPG) were measured using ocular response analyzer (ORA).
  • Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and central corneal thickness (CCT) were also recorded; statistical analysis included t-tests and general linear models.

Main Results:

  • Patients with PEXG demonstrated significantly lower mean CH (8.8 ± 1.4 mm Hg) and CRF (9.5 ± 1.8 mm Hg) compared to the POAG group (CH: 9.9 ± 1.2 mm Hg; CRF: 11.1 ± 1.3 mm Hg).
  • IOPG and GAT were significantly lower in the PEXG group (14.7 ± 2.7 mm Hg and 14.6 ± 2.7 mm Hg, respectively) than in the POAG group (16.5 ± 2.5 mm Hg and 16.4 ± 2.8 mm Hg, respectively).
  • No significant differences were observed in IOPCC, CCT, or patient age between the PEXG and POAG groups.

Conclusions:

  • Corneal biomechanical properties, specifically CH and CRF, are significantly reduced in patients with PEXG compared to POAG.
  • These findings highlight distinct biomechanical profiles between PEXG and POAG.
  • Further investigation is warranted to explore the clinical significance of these differences and their potential association with the prognosis of PEXG.