Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

9.3K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
9.3K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

9.9K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.9K
Quartile01:15

Quartile

7.2K
Quartiles are numbers that separate the data into quarters. Quartiles may or may not be part of the data. To find the quartiles, first, find the median or second quartile. The first quartile, Q1, is the middle value of the lower half of the data, and the third quartile, Q3, is the middle value, or median, of the upper half of the data. To get the idea, consider the same data set:
1; 1; 2; 2; 4; 6; 6.8; 7.2; 8; 8.3; 9; 10; 10; 11.5
The median or second quartile is seven. The lower half of the...
7.2K
Distribution Reliability and Automation01:25

Distribution Reliability and Automation

678
Distribution reliability in electrical power systems is critical for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply to consumers at minimal cost. According to IEEE Standard Terms, reliability is the probability that a device will function without failure over a specified time period or amount of usage. For electric power distribution, this translates to maintaining continuous power supply and addressing customer concerns over power outages. Several indices, as defined by IEEE Standard 1366-2012, are...
678
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

8.8K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
8.8K
Critical Values01:31

Critical Values

9.5K
A critical value is a definite value obtained from a particular probability distribution at a predecided confidence level (or a predecided significance level) for a given population parameter. The critical value provides demarcation that separates the sample statistics that are likely to occur from the ones that are unlikely to occur based on the given probability distribution and the population parameter to be estimated. The critical value for normal distribution is obtained from the z...
9.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Data driven pathway analysis and forecast of global warming and sea level rise.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Alpha, FACTT, and Beyond.

Psychometrika·2021
Same author

Distributionally weighted least squares in structural equation modeling.

Psychological methods·2021
Same author

Psychometric Properties of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life 36-Item Short-Form Survey (KDQOL-36) in the United States.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation·2017
Same author

Covariate-free and Covariate-dependent Reliability.

Psychometrika·2016
Same author

Specificity-enhanced reliability coefficients.

Psychological methods·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

10.8K

Quantile lower bounds to reliability based on locally optimal splits.

Tyler D Hunt1, Peter M Bentler

  • 1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA, tyler.hunt@utah.edu.

Psychometrika
|December 6, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces new quantile lower bound coefficients for measuring reliability, offering improved estimates over traditional methods. These coefficients provide better protection against overestimation, especially in smaller samples.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

10.8K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow
09:18

Author Spotlight: Assessing the Reliability of Doppler Ultrasound in Measuring Leg Blood Flow

Published on: December 15, 2023

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical modeling
  • Reliability theory

Background:

  • Traditional reliability measures like Guttman's split-half coefficients can overestimate population reliability (ρ), particularly in small samples.
  • Existing lower bounds may not adequately address the issue of capitalizing on chance associations.
  • There is a need for more robust reliability estimators that provide better protection against overestimation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate new quantile lower bound coefficients (λ 4(Q)) for estimating reliability.
  • To extend Guttman's theory of lower bounds to reliability.
  • To provide new lower bounds that offer improved protection against overestimation compared to existing methods.

Main Methods:

  • Development of quantile lower bound coefficients (λ 4(Q)) based on the distribution of split-half coefficients across variable partitions.
  • Theoretical formulation, algorithmic development, and implementation in R for computing λ 4(Q) coefficients.
  • Simulation studies to assess the performance of λ 4(Q) coefficients against coefficient alpha and greatest lower bound.

Main Results:

  • The new coefficients λ 4(0.05), λ 4(0.50), and λ 4(0.95) provide novel lower bounds to reliability.
  • λ 4(0.05) offers the greatest protection against overestimation due to chance associations.
  • λ 4(0.50) serves as a median estimator, while λ 4(0.95) shows reduced bias compared to previous estimators.

Conclusions:

  • Quantile lower bound coefficients offer a valuable advancement in reliability estimation.
  • λ 4(0.05) is recommended for its conservative estimation and protection against overestimation.
  • The developed methods and R code facilitate the application of these new reliability coefficients.