Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.6K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.6K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

712
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
712
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

7.5K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
7.5K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.7K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.7K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

1.1K
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
1.1K
Assumptions of Survival Analysis01:15

Assumptions of Survival Analysis

492
Survival models analyze the time until one or more events occur, such as death in biological organisms or failure in mechanical systems. These models are widely used across fields like medicine, biology, engineering, and public health to study time-to-event phenomena. To ensure accurate results, survival analysis relies on key assumptions and careful study design.
492

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Factors influencing pharmaceutical companies' decisions to pursue compassionate use programs in the EU: a qualitative study in The Netherlands.

Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice·2026
Same author

Individual patient data meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors submitted for regulatory approval in adult obsessive-compulsive disorder.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2025
Same author

The impact of operational trial approaches on representativeness: Comparison of decentralized clinical trial participants, conventional trial participants, and patients in daily practice.

Drug discovery today·2025
Same author

Experiences with low-intervention clinical trials-the new category under the European Union Clinical Trials Regulation.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2025
Same author

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·2025
Same author

Multiple Perspectives on the Need for Real-World Evidence to Inform Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Decision-Making: Scoping Review and Stakeholder Interviews.

Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K

Performance of instrumental variable methods in cohort and nested case-control studies: a simulation study.

Md Jamal Uddin1, Rolf H H Groenwold, Anthonius de Boer

  • 1Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
|December 6, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Instrumental variable (IV) analysis is unreliable with weak IV-exposure links, particularly in nested case-control (NCC) designs. Stronger associations improve IV estimate stability, especially with more controls in NCC studies.

Keywords:
biascohortconfounding in epidemiologyinstrumental variablenested case-controlpharmacoepidemiologyrare outcomesimulationvariabilityweak IV

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.3K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.3K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacoepidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Observational Research

Background:

  • Instrumental variable (IV) analysis is increasingly used in pharmacoepidemiology to address confounding in observational studies.
  • A strong association between the instrumental variable (IV) and exposure is a critical prerequisite for valid IV analysis.
  • Weak IV-exposure associations can lead to biased and unstable IV estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of instrumental variable (IV) estimates in various pharmacoepidemiologic settings.
  • To assess the impact of IV-exposure association strength on estimate bias and variability.
  • To compare IV performance across cohort and nested case-control (NCC) designs.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated data for continuous/binary exposure, outcome, and IV in cohort and NCC designs.
  • Assessed IV-exposure association using Pearson's correlation, point bi-serial correlation, odds ratio (OR), and F-statistic.
  • Employed two-stage analysis to estimate exposure effects.

Main Results:

  • IV estimates were unstable and biased with very weak IV-exposure associations (e.g., Pearson's correlation < 0.15, OR < 2.0).
  • Stronger IVs yielded unbiased and less variable estimates compared to weaker IVs.
  • Nested case-control (NCC) designs showed more variability than cohort designs, especially for rare outcomes, but variability decreased with more controls per case.
  • Bias occurred when IVs were related to confounders, even with strong IVs.

Conclusions:

  • Instrumental variable (IV) analysis is unreliable with extremely weak IV-exposure associations, particularly in NCC designs.
  • Increasing the number of controls per case in NCC designs enhances the stability of IV estimates.
  • NCC designs require a stronger IV-exposure association than cohort designs for stable estimates due to not utilizing the entire cohort.