Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

LOINC-Related Clinical Terminology Management in an Academic Medical Center Using Human in the Loop Machine Learning.

Applied clinical informatics·2026
Same author

International modified Delphi consensus statement on visible light photoprotection: Effects, measurement, and recommendations.

The Journal of investigative dermatology·2026
Same author

Performance of hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (HDRS-ISO 23698) methodology for assessment of sunscreen protection in the ALT-SPF Consortium validation study.

International journal of cosmetic science·2025
Same author

Test design and results of a method performance characterization study for SPF and UVA-PF testing.

International journal of cosmetic science·2025
Same author

The variability of in vivo sunscreen sun protection factor values.

International journal of cosmetic science·2025
Same author

Assessing the safety of new germicidal far-UVC technologies.

Photochemistry and photobiology·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 5, 2026

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing
06:24

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing

Published on: May 28, 2013

42.1K

Sunscreens--what is the ideal testing model?

Curtis Cole1

  • 1Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Co. Inc., Skillman, NJ, USA.

Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine
|December 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sunscreen testing methods have advanced from human trials to sophisticated lab techniques. Modern non-invasive methods offer improved accuracy and eliminate human UV exposure risks.

Keywords:
SPFUVA protectiondiffuse reflectance spectroscopyefficacysunscreen

More Related Videos

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
06:31

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

Published on: October 3, 2019

8.2K
Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate DMBA-TPA
04:12

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate DMBA-TPA

Published on: December 19, 2019

14.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing
06:24

Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing

Published on: May 28, 2013

42.1K
Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
06:31

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose MED Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response

Published on: October 3, 2019

8.2K
Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate DMBA-TPA
04:12

Chemical-Induced Skin Carcinogenesis Model Using Dimethylbenz[a]Anthracene and 12-O-Tetradecanoyl Phorbol-13-Acetate DMBA-TPA

Published on: December 19, 2019

14.4K

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology and photobiology
  • Analytical chemistry
  • Regulatory science

Background:

  • Sunscreen assessment methods have evolved significantly over time.
  • Technological advancements drive changes in sunscreen testing protocols.
  • Historical methods involved human UV exposure, posing risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the historical development of sunscreen protection assessment methodologies.
  • To highlight recent advancements in non-invasive sunscreen testing.
  • To discuss the impact of scientific progress on regulatory standards.

Main Methods:

  • Historical review of sunscreen testing techniques.
  • Analysis of laboratory-based methods including solar simulators.
  • Examination of spectrophotometry and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy.
  • Focus on emerging non-invasive testing technologies.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated a clear progression from subjective human testing to objective laboratory measurements.
  • Highlighted the increasing sophistication of analytical instruments used in sunscreen evaluation.
  • Identified non-invasive techniques as the latest frontier in accurate sunscreen assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Scientific innovation continuously refines sunscreen protection assessment.
  • Modern non-invasive methods enhance accuracy and safety in sunscreen testing.
  • The evolution of testing methods supports regulatory updates and improved product efficacy.