Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

Long-term Behavioral and Reproductive Consequences of Embryonic Exposure to Low-dose Toxicants
Published on: March 6, 2018
Methods to determine resistance to anthelmintics when continuing larval development occurs
M Lyndal-Murphy1, A J Swain2, P M Pepper2
1AgriScience Queensland, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Australia.
Accurate detection of anthelmintic resistance (AR) in ruminants requires using pre- and post-drench fecal egg counts from both treated and untreated control groups, especially when larval development continues. Applying a second resistance rule alongside the standard one improves detection accuracy.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Parasitology
- Anthelmintic Resistance
- Ruminant Health
Background:
- The fecal egg count reduction test (FECRT) is standard for detecting anthelmintic resistance (AR) in ruminant gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN).
- Variations in FECRT methodology exist, impacting accuracy, particularly when larval development persists during testing.
- Commonly targeted GIN, like Haemonchus contortus and Cooperia punctata, often exhibit high biotic potential or re-infection rates, complicating AR assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the most appropriate FECRT method for calculating AR under conditions of continuing larval development.
- To evaluate different FECRT designs and resistance-indicating rules using computer simulations.
- To provide guidance on accurate AR detection in pasture-based ruminant systems.
Main Methods:
- Computer simulations were employed to model three FECRT designs: post-drench counts only, pre- and post-drench counts for treatment groups, and pre- and post-drench counts for both treatment and control groups.
- Simulated fecal worm egg counts (FEC) were generated using negative binomial and binomial distributions, incorporating variables for worm burden, larval development, and drench resistance.
- Calculations of percent reduction and confidence limits followed Standing Committee for Agriculture (SCA) guidelines, with additional analysis using cumulative inverse Beta distributions for FEC.
Main Results:
- Simulations indicated that calculating AR from pre- and post-drench FEC of both untreated control and treatment groups is essential when larval development occurs during FECRT.
- Two resistance rules were assessed: (1) %reduction (%R) <95% and lower confidence limit <90%; and (2) upper confidence limit <95%.
- Applying both rules is recommended, particularly when %R falls between 90-95%, to enhance the detection of anthelmintic resistance.
Conclusions:
- For accurate anthelmintic resistance detection in ruminants, especially with GIN exhibiting continuous larval development, FECRT protocols must include pre- and post-drench FEC from both treated and untreated control groups.
- The study highlights the necessity of using robust statistical methods and potentially multiple resistance criteria to reliably identify AR.
- Adherence to recommended FECRT designs and interpretation rules is crucial for effective parasite control strategies in livestock.
More Related Videos
05:19Evaluation of Antioxidant and Anthelmintic Properties of Tithonia diversifolia Extracts Against Gastrointestinal Nematode Eggs Using In Vitro Assays
Published on: August 1, 2025
08:11Measuring Caenorhabditis elegans Sensitivity to the Acetylcholine Receptor Agonist Levamisole
Published on: June 7, 2022