Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

09:01
The Double-H Maze: A Robust Behavioral Test for Learning and Memory in Rodents
Published on: July 8, 2015
12.2K
Younger apes and human children plan their moves in a maze task
Christoph J Völter1, Josep Call2
1Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Germany; University of Bielefeld, Department of Animal Behaviour, Germany.
Cognition
|December 10, 2013
Summary
Great apes and young children show planning abilities, but with age-related differences and distinct limitations. This research explores the evolution of executive functions in planning behavior.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Evolution
- Developmental Psychology
- Comparative Cognition
Background:
- Planning is a key executive function for complex problem-solving.
- Understanding its origins requires examining both developmental (ontogenetic) and evolutionary (phylogenetic) trajectories.
- Executive functions are critical for goal-directed behavior across species.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the ontogenetic and phylogenetic origins of planning abilities.
- To compare planning skills in great apes and human preschoolers.
- To identify age-related changes and species-specific limitations in planning.
Main Methods:
- A vertical maze task was administered to four great ape species (N=12) and human preschoolers (4- and 5-year-olds, N=24).
- Subjects had to retrieve a reward by navigating a maze with flexible trap configurations, requiring planning up to two steps ahead.
- Performance was assessed based on the ability to plan actions in response to varying task demands.
Main Results:
- Planning ability in nonhuman apes showed a negative correlation with age.
- Five-year-old children and younger apes could plan two steps ahead, while four-year-olds planned only one step ahead.
- Both apes and children demonstrated similar task performance but differed in underlying limitations: apes struggled with motor control, while children had difficulty with attentional shifting.
Conclusions:
- Planning skills develop differently across species and with age.
- Nonhuman apes' planning is constrained by motor control, whereas human children's planning is limited by attentional flexibility.
- This study provides insights into the evolutionary and developmental pathways of executive functions, particularly planning.

